I wish the media would give the Romney International trip more context. Here are some interesting facts that should have been within the narrative of the media. He chose Great Britain, Israel, and Poland as the countries to visit.
It is quite ironic that all the countries Mitt Romney visited provide universal healthcare. Israel specifically uses around 8% of GDP on healthcare and has better outcomes than America. The article from Forbes in the post below details the Israeli system as well as Romney’s endearment to it in a speech while there. Poland and Great Britain covers all of their citizens as well.
Interesting enough this guy who simply shows a despise for unions wasn’t so anti-union in his praise of Poland. Solidarity, a worker’s union generally opposed by Romney and Republicans were instrumental in Polish freedom. I don’t need to go further into social safety nets etc. The Romney of Massachusetts may be a more credible candidate. The Romney of the Right Wing is a complex act to follow.
Whiplash-Mitt Romney Lavishes Praise On Israel’s Socialist, Government Controlled Healthcare System
Rick Ungar , Contributor
Mitt Romney seems to be laboring under the impression that whatever he says in a foreign country will—like a weekend in Las Vegas—somehow stay in that foreign country.
Either that or he figures nobody back home is paying any attention.
Speaking today to a small group of Israeli contributors to his campaign, the GOP presidential candidate—and supposed sworn enemy of government controlled healthcare—had kind words for the success of Israel’s healthcare system.
“When our health care costs are completely out of control. Do you realize what health care spending is as a percentage of the GDP in Israel? 8 percent. You spend 8 percent of GDP on health care. And you’re a pretty healthy nation”
A healthy nation, indeed.
With a life-expectancy rate that is the 4th best in the world (the United States is 38th) and a reputation for delivering high-quality care to all of its citizens by utilizing the most advanced medical technology available in a hospital system we can only envy from afar, Governor Romney is right to be impressed with the Israelis’ ability to deliver excellent care while keeping spending down to 8 percent of GDP as compared to 18 percent here in the United States.
If only Romney’s appreciation of Israel’s success did not fly smack in the face of his constant, ideologically based rhetoric guaranteed to insure that only the wealthiest Americans get a taste of the healthcare Israelis receive as their birthright.
Or does the Governor simply not understand that Israel’s healthcare success story—including their ability to control costs— is the direct result of the nation’s socialized healthcare system that has existed since the country’s founding in 1948 and institutionalized by law in 1995?
Today, the nation of Israel requires that every Israeli belong to one of four health maintenance organizations (that’s right…mandated participation)—each operating as a non-profit and each funded by the Israeli government via a progressive tax that every citizen is obligated to pay based on their earnings.
What’s more, the uniform benefits offered by the HMOs are established by the central government and must be made available to every single citizen—regardless of their medical circumstances (the phrase ‘pre-existing condition’ apparently does not exist in the Hebrew language.)
And those basic benefits made available to all Israelis are pretty darn good.
They include medical diagnosis and treatment, preventative medicine, any required hospitalization for any reason whatsoever, surgery, organ transplants, ambulance or transport service, treatment for drug abuse and alcoholism, medical equipment and appliances, obstetrics and fertility treatments, all prescribed pharmaceuticals, and physiotherapy and occupational therapy.