I saw on one of the MSM networks today that after accounting for entitlements, Social Security, Medicare, & Medicaid as well as the interest on the national debt that only 24% or so is left for discretionary spending. With increasing yearly borrowing the interest on the debt will continue to rise dramatically.
It is rather amusing that in order to get us out of this dilemma, that these entitlements would be one of the first programs we touch. While we continue to under tax those that almost brought the country to the brink as well as those who continue to outsource our jobs we are quick to wage war on the middle class and the lower class.
Is it so difficult to understand that the genesis of the problem is demonstrably the tax cuts that occurred after a massive surplus that in effect transferred that surplus to the top 2%. Is it so difficult to understand that deficit spending is double dipping by the wealthy 2% as the additional income from the tax cuts are then used to purchase the debt (risk free bonds) created by said tax cuts?
Many are taken aback as I continuously beg for the middle class to join the class war to defend themselves. Is it not evident that the war against the middle class began over 30 years ago?
My Book: As I See It: Class Warfare The Only Resort To Right Wing Doom
Book’s Webpage: http://amzn.to/dt72c7 – Twitter: http://twitter.com/egbertowillies
White House Backs Down On Social Security Cuts In State Of The Union arthur@huffingtonpost.com | HuffPost Reporting
After months of behind-the-scenes scrimmaging, President Barack Obama has decided not to endorse cutting Social Security or raising the retirement age in his State of the Union address Tuesday night.
The news, first reported by The Washington Post, comes after Social Security advocates ramped up their defense of the program. Liberal senators heralded a rare victory Monday afternoon.
"I was very pleased to see in the media this afternoon Obama will not endorse raising the retirement age or reducing Social Security benefits," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said during a conference call with reporters.
In December, Obama’s National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform recommended raising the retirement age and reducing some Social Security benefits, and many expected the president to embrace those recommendations in the State of the Union address.
"For tens of millions of American workers and senior citizens, that is very welcome news," Sanders said. "I applaud the president for standing up for Social Security, for his understand that this is a program that has worked fantastically well for 75 years and that he is going to defend it."
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) expressed similar sentiments on Monday’s conference call.
"Ultimately, the president demonstrating to the American people and to the Republicans a willingness to fight and win on issues that are core issues for him will help him in the negotiating process by strengthening his hand and strengthening the resolve of people who are working with him," Whitehouse said. "I think we both look forward to a bipartisan process going forward in the next two years, but we also look forward to the president showing strong leadership on critical issues and being willing to stand and fight on points where he feels that’s in the best interest of the nation."
Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), who will deliver the GOP’s response to the State of the Union address, is the author of a fiscal "road map" that includes partial privatization of the program along with "modernization" of the retirement age.
The Social Security Act’s old-age insurance program is largely responsible for reducing elderly poverty over the past several decades to the lowest rate of any age group (though that figure may actually be higher, according to alternate measurements).
White House Backs Down On Social Security Cuts In State Of The Union