The manner in which the media address the Clinton Foundation vs the Trump Foundation is a clear example of willful media bias. Trump actually paid to play. In short, his $25,000 pay likely prevented a play to charge his Trump University.
Trump’ foundation not Hillary’s seemed to have paid for play
Trump has a legitimate pay for play scandal for which he paid a fine. Media coverage virtually disregards it as they scrutinize Clinton Foundation. Here is the transcript of the video clip.
Joy-Ann Reid(Host): Donald Trump today answered questions about a $25,000 check the Trump Foundation gave to Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi in 2013. As The Washington Post reports this week, Trump has now paid a $2,500 penalty to the IRS for that gift, because the Trump Foundation, a registered non-profit, violated tax laws by giving a political contribution. Trump organization officials have claimed that the violation was an honest mistake and say that Trump has reimbursed the foundation. News of this donation is raising eyebrows, because at the time, Bondi was considering whether to investigate fraud allegations against Trump University and wound up not pursuing the case. Bondi isn’t the only state attorney general to find a fat check in her campaign coffers from Trump. In June, the AP reported that Trump donated $35,000 to then-Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott’s successful gubernatorial campaign, three years after Abbott dropped his investigation into Trump U. … Pam Bondi, who we both well know, she has not been able to really escape the story, but at the same time it hasn’t seemed to hurt her. My question is whether or not this winds up hurting Donald Trump in some way.
Fernand Amandi: Only if the Democrats decide to make it an issue. Let’s play a game, Joy. Let’s take out Donald Trump’s name and plug in Hillary Clinton’s name and ask what would have happened if Hillary Clinton had paid off a Democratic state attorney general and had a favorable decision afterward? Donald Trump would be going crazy. All of the corrupt Hillary epithets would be out there. Why is this not the exact case of corrupt Donald doing something that clearly is pay-for-play? One-off? Maybe. Twice, a trend. Greg Abbott, Pam Bondi.
Joy-Ann Reid(Host): That is a question, again, for the media. You haven’t heard the calls to shut down the Trump Foundation. You haven’t heard, really much about this story at all to be honest with you. But this seems to be as direct an instance of what really looks like pay-for-play as we’ve seen so far.
Eric Boehlert: For 18 months the press has been looking for a pay-for-play for the Clinton Foundation, quid pro quo. It started in the spring of last year. They haven’t found it. This is exactly what they have been looking for. This is, as he said, this would be all over the news. One mention on the Sunday shows over the weekend about it. Very little headlines or things like that. Previously Washington Post, New York Times, USA Today all wrote editorials: “you have to shut down the Clinton Foundation.” Not because they’ve done anything wrong. It just doesn’t look good. Now we’ve got Trump sending $25,000 checks to get investigations shut down. Where are those editorials, right? Where is that thunder? Where is that lecturing tone about how Trump really needs to figure out how to abide by the ethics? This is an amazing, amazing double standard. …
Fernand Amandi: Bill Clinton had an ill-advised meeting with Loretta Lynch on an airplane. They sat and talked. And the world blew up. Here is a smoking gun of a check not in one case, not in two cases, where you have the central issue, Trump University, the ultimate Donald Trump con on the table.
(r/t MediaMatters)