What seems like the attempt on MAGA former President Donald Trump’s life may not be all it appears to be. to most.
A GOP without Trump would not destroy MAGA.
Podcasts (Video — Audio)
The political landscape in the United States is undergoing rapid and unprecedented changes. The assumption that a Republican Party devoid of Trump would dismantle the MAGA movement or halt the advance of Project 2025 is fundamentally flawed. The essence of MAGA transcends Trump, and the ambitions of Project 2025 extend far beyond his singular influence.
Firstly, it is essential to acknowledge that the MAGA movement did not originate with Donald Trump. With his flamboyant persona and incendiary rhetoric, Trump served as a lightning rod, energizing and mobilizing a segment of the American populace that felt disillusioned and disenfranchised. This group harbored grievances and fears that predated Trump’s rise. The roots of MAGA can be traced back to a broader reactionary trend within the Republican Party, fueled by economic anxieties, cultural shifts, and a growing distrust of governmental institutions.
Trump’s role has been that of a figurehead, a performative leader who articulated the anger and aspirations of his base. However, the underlying ideology of MAGA—characterized by nativism, economic nationalism, and authoritarian tendencies—was already fermenting within the GOP. A coalition of conservative media sustains the movement, think tanks, and wealthy benefactors who have long sought to reshape American society in their image.
Project 2025 exemplifies this broader agenda. Spearheaded by influential conservative groups such as the Heritage Foundation, Project 2025 aims to transform the federal government fundamentally. Its objectives include dismantling regulatory agencies, weakening labor protections, and rolling back civil rights advancements. These goals align with the broader conservative vision of a minimal state that prioritizes corporate interests and diminishes the power of democratic institutions.
Trump’s administration provided a fertile ground for these initiatives, but he was merely the executor, not the architect. The real architects are the billionaire donors, corporate lobbyists, and ideological think tanks that drive the Republican Party’s agenda. These entities have invested heavily in creating a political and intellectual infrastructure to outlast any politician, including Trump.
Moreover, the notion that removing Trump would lead to a significant ideological shift within the GOP is overly optimistic. The Republican Party has been gradually radicalized over the past few decades, moving further to the right on many issues. This trajectory is unlikely to change simply because one figure is no longer at the helm. The party’s base has been reconditioned to embrace a more extreme form of conservatism, which is unlikely to be tempered by Trump’s absence.
Furthermore, the reaction to any perceived attempt on Trump’s life underscores the volatility and deep divisions within the country. While no one should condone violence against any political figure, the discourse surrounding such an event reveals the extent to which Trump has become a martyr-like figure for his followers. The real danger lies in the potential for Trump’s base to coalesce around an even more extreme leader or to radicalize further in response to perceived threats.
The progressive movement must recognize that the fight against MAGA and Project 2025 is not about one man but a broader ideological battle. This means confronting the structural and systemic issues that have allowed such movements to gain traction. It requires a comprehensive strategy that addresses economic inequality, combats disinformation, and rebuilds trust in democratic institutions.
Progressives must also acknowledge the role of neoliberal policies in creating the conditions for MAGA’s rise. Decades of neoliberalism have left many working-class Americans feeling abandoned and betrayed by both major parties. The progressive agenda must offer a compelling alternative prioritizing economic justice, social equity, and genuine democratic participation.
The absence of Donald Trump from the political stage would not spell the end of the MAGA movement or halt the ambitions of Project 2025. The forces driving these phenomena are profoundly entrenched and extend far beyond individuals. Progressives must remain vigilant and focused, advocating for policies that address the root causes of division and inequality. Only through sustained effort and a commitment to transformative change can the progressive movement hope to counteract the reactionary tide represented by MAGA and Project 2025. The future of American democracy depends on it.
Viewers are encouraged to subscribe and join the conversation for more insightful commentary and to support progressive messages. Together, we can populate the internet with progressive messages that represent the true aspirations of most Americans.