Electing Trump the first time was a mistake. A second time would prove we’re not smart” analyzes the consequences of his initial tenure and warns of the implications of re-election, highlighting that it would reflect poorly on the nation’s judgment and foresight.
Electing Trump: 1st time’s a mistake. 2nd time, not smart.
Podcasts (Video — Audio)
The election of Donald Trump in 2016 shocked not only the United States but the entire world. Many saw it as a tragic mistake, an anomaly in the American political system—a product of disillusionment with the status quo combined with a dangerous underestimation of Trump’s potential to harm the very fabric of democracy. The world, particularly America’s allies, hoped this was just a one-off error, a regrettable but rectifiable decision that the American electorate would not repeat. However, as the specter of a second Trump term looms over the 2024 election, the possibility of making the same mistake again sends ripples of fear across the United States and globally.
Many of Trump’s supporters, either due to ignorance or apathy, fail to recognize or care about how the rest of the world perceives the United States under his leadership. To them, Trump’s America is a nation reasserting its dominance, taking care of its interests first, and refusing to bow to the globalist agendas of international bodies and foreign powers. However, this myopic worldview ignores the profound interconnectedness of modern nations and the responsibility of being a global leader. The world looked on with anxiety as Trump’s policies and rhetoric tore at the threads of international cooperation, and the prospect of a second term threatened even more significant harm.
The United States has long been considered a global leader, a status earned not just by military might or economic power but by its values—democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. These are values that the world has looked up to, even as America’s record has been imperfect. Trump’s first term, marked by a disregard for these principles, damaged America’s standing. His administration’s policies on immigration, climate change, and international alliances alienated traditional allies and emboldened authoritarian regimes. Re-electing Trump would signal to the world that America has turned its back on these values and that the beacon of democracy is dimming.
More importantly, a second Trump term would indicate that the erosion of democratic norms and institutions in the United States is not a temporary lapse but a systemic issue. This would have dire consequences for the U.S. and the world. Other nations, particularly those with fragile democracies, could take this as a signal that the American model is no longer worth emulating. They might look elsewhere for leadership to nations like Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, where authoritarianism is on the rise and democratic freedoms are increasingly under attack. The decline of American leadership would create a vacuum that could be filled by forces that do not share the values of democracy and human rights.
The consequences of a second Trump term would not be limited to geopolitics. Domestically, it would further entrench the policies that have exacerbated inequality, undermined social safety nets, and eroded environmental protections. Trump’s brand of governance, which prioritizes corporate interests and deregulation, is a direct threat to the well-being of ordinary Americans. The push for “small government” that has long been a rallying cry of the Republican Party is nothing more than a veiled attempt to strip away the protections that government provides against the excesses of capitalism. The reality is that a government that is too weak to stand up to corporate power is a government that cannot protect its citizens.
Trump’s first term saw a significant rollback of regulations designed to protect the environment, public health, and worker rights. These regulations exist because corporations would prioritize profit over people without them. The environmental disasters in places like Love Canal and the polluted Ohio River are stark reminders of what happens when the government fails to enforce regulations. The idea that the private sector, motivated solely by profit, can be trusted to regulate itself is a dangerous fallacy that has been disproven repeatedly.
Health insurance companies are an excellent example of the failure of the private sector in specific areas. The notion that health insurance companies provide a valuable service to society is flawed. The private health insurance system in the United States is a prime example of how capitalism can go awry when left unchecked. Health insurance companies do not provide health care; they are middlemen who profit by denying care to those who need it most. The costs associated with maintaining many private insurance companies—each with administrative costs, advertising budgets, and executive salaries—are passed on to consumers through higher premiums. The argument that competition among insurance companies benefits consumers is a myth; in reality, it only benefits the shareholders and executives of those companies. Universal healthcare (Medicare for All) is the only objective answer.
The progressive argument for a robust and right-sized government is not about expanding government for the sake of it; it’s about ensuring that the government can protect the public good. This means having the power to regulate industries that, left to their own devices, would prioritize profit over people. It means having the resources to provide essential services like health care, education, and infrastructure. It also means having the authority to stand up to powerful corporate interests that would otherwise run roughshod over the rights of individuals.
Re-electing Trump would be a catastrophic mistake, one that would signal to the world that the United States has abandoned its leadership role and that it no longer values the principles of democracy, equality, and justice. It would confirm that the decline of American democracy is not a fluke but a trend. The consequences would be felt not just in the U.S. but worldwide, as other nations lose faith in the American model and seek alternatives that may not align with democratic values.
The choice before the American electorate in 2024 is not just about who will lead the country for the next four years. It’s about whether the United States will continue to be a beacon of democracy and a leader on the global stage or whether it will retreat into a dangerous form of nationalism that threatens the very fabric of its democracy and the well-being of its people. Electing Trump the first time was a mistake; doing it again would be a tragedy of historic proportions.