Kristen Welker exposed a previous tweet from JD Vance where he said Trump is reprehensible for his xenophobia. She asked him if he was now like Trump.
NBC Host Kristen Welker calls out JD Vance on an old tweet.
Podcasts (Video — Audio)
JD Vance, the Republican senator from Ohio, was interviewed on several morning shows. He showed that he represents the same evil the former president represents but with a more affable demeanor. Fortunately, even as the media does not challenge his lies, misinformation, and vile as they should, at least there is some pushback.
In a recent interview, the former senator was particularly uncomfortable when confronted by NBC host Kristen Welker. The segment, which has since made rounds on social media, underscores a crucial problem within the modern conservative movement: the hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance often displayed by those who once condemned Donald Trump, only to embrace him for political expediency later.
Setting the Stage for Confrontation
The exchange begins with Welker quoting Vance from October 2016, when he stated, “Trump makes people I care about afraid — immigrants, Muslims, etc. — because of this, I find him reprehensible. God wants better of us.” This remark is as clear a condemnation of Trump’s divisive rhetoric as one could hope to find, particularly from someone who, at the time, was being touted as a rising star among Republicans for his bestselling memoir Hillbilly Elegy.
Welker doesn’t mince words. She presses Vance, asking him directly if he is now engaging in the same behavior he once labeled as reprehensible. It’s a bold and necessary question, highlighting the all-too-common shift seen in several high-profile Republicans who once decried Trump’s demagoguery but now align themselves with him.
JD Vance’s Attempt at a Defense
Vance’s response, however, is a textbook example of evasion. Instead of addressing his past condemnation of Trump, he tries to justify his change of heart by pointing to the current situation in Springfield, Ohio, where bomb threats and xenophobic fears against Haitian immigrants are taking root. Vance claims that he changed his mind about Trump as he “learned more” about him, suggesting that the situation in Springfield somehow vindicates Trump’s past rhetoric.
What Vance fails to acknowledge — and what Welker expertly alludes to — is the harm caused by such rhetoric. By portraying immigrants as a threat, as he did in the interview, Vance is effectively doing what he once found morally objectionable. His justification does not hold up to scrutiny, particularly when examined through the lens of his earlier statements condemning Trump for inciting fear among vulnerable groups.
A Career Move Wrapped in Hypocrisy
Vance’s political evolution is not unique, but it is emblematic of a larger problem within today’s Republican Party: the willingness to sacrifice principles for political gain. Once a vocal critic of Trump, Vance has transformed into one of his staunchest defenders, a move many see as opportunistic. This shift in position makes it clear he has no integrity, and his words cannot be trusted.
Welker’s line of questioning implicitly challenges Vance to confront his contradictions. If he truly believed that Trump’s actions were reprehensible in 2016, what has changed since then? The truth is, little has changed about Trump’s behavior or rhetoric. Instead, what has changed is Vance’s political calculus. Now, as a senator, he has tied his fortunes to Trump’s base, even if it means betraying his past convictions.
The Broader Implications of Vance’s Rhetoric
One of the most dangerous aspects of Vance’s current position is how he couches fear-mongering in the guise of concern for public safety. Vance continues to make dubious claims about immigrants potentially eating dogs and cats, claims with no credible evidence. Even if it were true, this would involve isolated incidents and not justify casting aspersions on an entire group of people. This sort of fear-based rhetoric has long been a tool of demagogues, used to dehumanize and scapegoat marginalized communities.
What Vance is doing here is perpetuating a narrative that places collective blame on immigrants, a tactic that has been employed throughout history to sow division and distract from the real issues facing society. The fact that he is willing to engage in this kind of rhetoric after previously condemning Trump for doing the same speaks volumes about his political priorities.
The Role of the Media and the Importance of Accountability
While Welker’s interview effectively exposed Vance’s hypocrisy on this specific issue, it also highlights a broader issue within the media: the tendency to give platforms to politicians who spread falsehoods and fear-mongering rhetoric. While it is crucial to hold these individuals accountable, too often, the media allows them to propagate dangerous ideas without sufficient pushback.
In this instance, Welker did an admirable job of holding Vance’s feet to the fire by highlighting this one tweet, but more is needed. The media must take greater responsibility in challenging the lies and misinformation that politicians like Vance spread. By giving them unchecked platforms, networks have normalized the very behavior that Vance once found reprehensible.
The Path Forward
The exchange between Welker and Vance serves as a microcosm of the larger political environment in the United States, where figures who once condemned Trump’s divisiveness now champion his causes. This hypocrisy is not only dangerous for the country’s political discourse but also for the marginalized communities that bear the brunt of such rhetoric.
For progressives, it is crucial to continue challenging these narratives, calling out politicians like Vance for their opportunism and holding the media accountable for how it handles these discussions. The fight for a more inclusive, equitable society depends on confronting and dismantling the fear-based politics that have become all too prevalent in today’s political landscape.
They must support platforms that promote progressive values and challenge the status quo to see real change. By doing so, they can help ensure that the voices of fear and division are drowned out by those advocating for unity, justice, and compassion. This interview shows the tension between personal ambition and moral integrity in American politics. For JD Vance, like so many others, ambition has won out.