Too many of us have seen this game before and it is self-defeating. The entire Democratic machine in a not so very subliminal manner is anointing Joe Biden as the preferential candidate to represent the Democratic Party against our corrupt president.
I sometimes wonder why the Democratic Establishment spends so much money on overpaid analysts. The reality is that when we win, it is in spite of their general advice. Joe Biden is supposed to be the guy that Donald Trump fears the most. It is yet another ruse.
If Joe Biden were to make it through the primaries, Trump and his machine will slaughter him. There is already a plausible narrative that will ostensibly skim both black and women voters. Worse, when one looks at the 2018 election and where the new Democratic voters are emanating from, he does not fit the profile. The one saving grace is that history is not kind to the frontrunner in fairly unrigged Democratic Primaries.
Unlike Senator Elizabeth Warren and Senator Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden continues to work with big-dollar donors. FAIR reports the following.
Biden has pledged that his 2020 campaign won’t take in any direct donations from lobbyists. But on the first night of his official candidacy, Biden hit the suburbs of Philadelphia to attend a $2,800 per person fundraiser at the home of David L. Cohen, the executive vice president and chief of lobbying for Comcast.
Comcast, one of the biggest lobbying spenders in Washington, also owns MSNBC, which has showered Biden with favorable coverage both before and since his announcement.
FAIR goes on to point out that just like the Right Wing media made light of Trump’s female insensitivity problems, MSNBC is doing the same for Joe Biden.
In March, Nevada lieutenant gubernatorial candidate Lucy Flores published an article in New York Magazine (3/29/19) that described how Biden inappropriately kissed her at a campaign event. Biden has quite a long history of awkward and inappropriate touching, kissing or groping of women and girls.
Mika Brzezinski, co-host of MSNBC’s Morning Joe, was one of the first to defend Biden (4/1/19). Brzezinski suggested that Flores’ allegation was politically motivated, citing Flores as a “huge Bernie person,” and asking, “Are we just supposed to take all the words and the fact she said she was violated at face value?” Her guests later that day (4/1/19), former DCCC chief of staff Adrienne Elrod and former CIA and DoD chief of staff Jeremy Bash, seemed to agree that such #MeToo accusations against Biden were “meaningless moments,” and merely baseless finger-pointing from Biden’s political opponents.
Brzezinski continued her defense of Biden the following day and later in the week on Morning Joe, after another woman came forward with allegations of inappropriate behavior (4/2/19, 4/5/19). Brzezinski said that the allegations were “sad,” and that Biden is a “nice guy” and “not a predator.” She continued:
This is ridiculous. The conversation has gotten out of control, and Democrats and those on the left who want to tweet me today and go nuts and get all woke, you’re eating your young. You’re eating those who can beat Trump. You’re killing the very people who have been pushing women ahead, who’ve been fighting for equal pay, who have been doing everything they can to respect women in their lives. We’re going to after Joe Biden for being affectionate to women of all ages, and to men as well? It’s ridiculous.
And if anyone doubts the Liberal media is all in.
While he is indeed a frontrunner, defense of Biden as supposedly the only candidate with the ability to beat Trump is frequently parroted by many corporate Democrats (and by totally, definitely well-meaning Republican Party figures as well). MSNBC contributor Mike Barnicle recently re-upped this trope (4/24/19) on the day of Biden’s announcement, though to his credit, Axios’ Jim Vandehei did push back on this narrative. …
On the same program, Joe Scarborough castigated Biden detractors, maintaining that they failed to understand the context of Biden’s past support for harsh drug laws, opposition to school integration and support for the Iraq War. He later added that “it’s easy for you to sit there behind your laptop, drinking your soy lattes in 2019 judging [him] for trying to make the country better.” Sharpton chimed in with further attacks on so-called “latte liberators” and “limousine liberals.”
But despite his folksiness (Extra!, 4/13), if there is anyone who serves the interests of financial giants who spend most of their time in limousines, it’s Joe Biden. Since the late 1970s, Biden has been the chief defender of the Delaware-based credit card industry in Congress, and played a crucial role in the passage of the 2005 bankruptcy law, which made it harder for Americans to wipe out and restructure unreasonable debts through Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Indeed, credit card company MBNA (formerly owned by Bank of America) was Biden’s second-largest donor throughout his Senate career. When Biden drafted the original version of the bankruptcy bill in 2000, he was strongly opposed by then-Harvard Law professor Elizabeth Warren, who was integral in getting the Clinton administration to block its passage. Biden has also been a consistent supporter of further financial deregulation, such as the Gramm-Bliley-Leach Act, which has been pointed to as a partial cause of the 2008 financial collapse.
Yet Biden’s extremely checkered political history, where he was consistently on the wrong sides of issues like women’s rights, racial equality, financial regulation, drugs and criminal justice, surveillance and war, still doesn’t seem to be enough for the media to deem him damaged goods. In fact, outlets like MSNBC still play up Biden as the most viable candidate, despite the fact that there are others with similarly long tenures in politics who didn’t make Biden’s same mistakes.
Joe Biden is a good man. He genuinely believes that his pragmatism and moderateness is good for the country. The Plutocracy can live with that. The reality is that the status quo is now a clear and present danger to the middle-class and the poor.
Too many continue to live abstracted from those who bad policies affect immensely. For those impacted, a marginal step may not be worth it. They may vie for a Trump reelection under the same premise many told me they did it in the first place, to disrupt the elite. Unfortunately, while that is Trump’s rhetoric, he has no intention of doing so. We need a candidate that will be boldly Progressive who does not fear to sell Americans what they already want and making it attainable for them.
Viewers are encouraged to subscribe and join the conversation for more insightful commentary and to support progressive messages. Together, we can populate the internet with progressive messages that represent the true aspirations of most Americans.
Joe is way ahead of the others in the polls. Even Sanders. I want a Dem that has a chance of winning.
Polls, and going to vote are two different things. Joe is not going to get people to the voting booths just as Hillary did not. His message will fall flat with the rightfully disenfranchised.
I’m wondering if Biden is ahead already in the polls simply because of name recognition/familiarity. I have to say, voting for him feels like a step backwards into more “establishment politics,” something the 2016 election showed us most Americans are tired of and don’t trust, for many reasons, and regardless of party. It seems like most of America doesn’t want combative/adversarial politics, entrenched and rigid part-isan (part-ial) views of life, unbalanced domination by any one party (as if one party has all the answers for all of America; doesn’t and can’t). Many independents, at least, are done with the power-hungry politics known as the Republican/Democrat duopoly. We need politics that considers the whole strata of our population: rich and poor, educated and uneducated, young and old, our whole society. There’s too many limited, narrow-minded, old-school thinkers in politics, too many out for their own personal, short-sighted gain.
I’m 71 and am more drawn to the messages and thinking of candidates like Pete Buttigieg, Andrew Yang, Beto O’Rourke (so far) in that they’re more about moving forward more than moving left-ist or right-ist, taking the best of both major parties, more than being just centrist, a higher view of sorts. It makes sense in the very complex country/world we live in. BTW, where are all the potential republican candidates? Only one, Bill Weld, seems to have the willingness/courage to take on Trump. What’s up with that? Does the republican party believe Trump is their best hope? Really? Is there no vision among them?
Back to Biden. Do we really want another big-money-sponsored candidate? More same-old same old establishment politics? Besides, I don’t think he has the political wits to face Trump effectively.