Democrats must never give up on any demographic. What they must do is work hard to earn them, something the Republicans have done using racism and xenophobia. We must use love and nurture.
Democrats must not abandon the working class.
Watch Politics Done Right T.V. here.
Podcasts (Video — Audio)
Summary
The speaker critiques Fareed Zakaria’s argument that Democrats should abandon the working class, particularly the white working class, and instead focus on college-educated voters and minorities. This is an elitist and misguided stance, as the working class—regardless of race—largely supports progressive policies when engaged effectively. Democrats made a mistake by ceding rural and working-class areas to Republicans, often assuming that these voters were too racist or reactionary to be won over. Using Obama’s 2008 victory as an example, it is clear that economic concerns can often transcend racial bias when candidates actively campaign on policies that improve people’s lives. Democrats must reinvest in rural communities and prioritize economic justice over corporate interests to reclaim lost ground.
Key Points
- Fareed Zakaria suggests Democrats should stop trying to win over the working class, which is an elitist mistake.
- The working class—both white and nonwhite—supports progressive policies like healthcare, unions, and fair wages when appropriately engaged.
- Democrats historically won working-class and rural voters but lost them due to economic betrayals, externally ignited prejudice, and lack of direct outreach.
- Obama’s campaign demonstrated that economic policies can persuade even racially prejudiced voters when their financial well-being is at stake.
- Democrats must stop prioritizing corporate interests and reinvest in rural and working-class communities to rebuild a durable majority.
Progressive Takeaway
Abandoning the working class, as Zakaria suggests, would be a disaster for democracy and economic justice. Progressives must reject this defeatist attitude and fight for policies that uplift all workers—rural, urban, Black, white, other, unionized, and non-unionized. The path forward isn’t elitism; it’s a bold, working-class agenda that challenges corporate power and restores faith in the government’s role in improving lives.
[ppp_patron_only level=2]
Fareed Zakaria’s recent argument that Democrats should move on from the working class and instead focus on their existing coalition of college-educated voters, minorities, and women is not just flawed—it is fundamentally undemocratic. To suggest that a major political party should abandon an entire swath of the population because they have been challenging to reach in recent elections reflects an elitist and defeatist mindset. Instead of giving up on working-class voters, the Democratic Party must double down on its commitment to policies that materially improve their lives, engaging them in ways that counteract decades of right-wing misinformation. The working class is not a monolith, and the idea that they are unreachable is a myth perpetuated by those who do not understand the complete picture.
The Working Class Is Still Progressive at Heart
The standard narrative suggests that the working class—particularly the white working class—has become irreversibly conservative, dominated by racism, sexism, and reactionary politics. However, polling data and real-world examples suggest otherwise. Many working-class voters still hold deeply progressive views on economic justice, healthcare, union rights, and even taxation on the wealthy. The problem is not that they are unreachable; Democrats have often failed to make a compelling case for them.
Take healthcare, for example. The closure of rural hospitals across the country, particularly in Republican-controlled states that refused to expand Medicaid, has devastated working-class communities. These communities would benefit immensely from Medicare for All or at least a public option, yet the Democratic establishment has often shied away from pushing for bold healthcare reforms. Instead of running on clear economic policies that would improve the lives of working people, too many Democrats have opted for technocratic half-measures or have been co-opted by corporate interests. This alienates voters with no apparent economic alternative between the two major parties. Every time a hospital closes in rural America, or someone dies because of a lack of service, or a farmer goes bankrupt, etc., a Democrat should be in that district pointing out that their Republican representatives supported said failure and that Democrats would solve it.
Obama’s Lesson: Economics Can Transcend Racism
Barack Obama’s 2008 and 2012 campaigns provide a critical lesson in why Democrats should not write off the working class. Obama won over some of the most racially prejudiced voters in America—not by appealing to their racism but by making an economic case that resonated more than their biases. A voter in Pennsylvania, described in the video, admitted outright racism but still cast a ballot for Obama because they believed he would improve their economic situation.
This reality debunks the notion that racism is an immovable barrier preventing Democrats from reaching the working class. While racism is certainly a tool the Republican Party has weaponized effectively, economic concerns often take precedence in voters’ minds when they feel that a candidate genuinely has their back. Democrats must stop treating economic populism as optional and make it the core of their strategy.
The Biggest Mistake: Ceding Rural America to the GOP
One of the gravest political miscalculations of the modern Democratic Party has been its abandonment of rural America. For decades, Democrats dominated in many working-class and rural areas, particularly in states like West Virginia, Kentucky, and Missouri. These states had strong unions, relied on social safety nets, and supported progressive economic policies. However, as Democrats moved toward neoliberal economic policies in the 1990s, they lost their grip on these voters. Bill Clinton’s signing of NAFTA, deregulation of Wall Street, and welfare reform alienated many working-class families. While these voters may not have understood the technical reasons that neoliberal policies affected them, they knew Democrats (and Republicans) voted for them. Republicans just learned how to put a facade with a dose of multifaceted prejudice to earn their trust. Over time, Republicans capitalized on this economic ‘betrayal’ by shifting the conversation to culture wars, turning voters against Democrats despite the GOP’s economic policies being even worse for them.
If Democrats want to win back the working class, they must stop merely showing up in rural America during election season and start investing in these communities year-round. This means supporting policies that bring jobs to small towns, expanding broadband access, fighting for rural hospitals, and championing workers’ rights. It also means breaking free from corporate influence, which prevents Democrats from being the preferred party of the working class.
Why Fareed Zakaria’s Argument Is Dangerous
Zakaria’s argument that Democrats should write off working-class voters is not just an electoral mistake; it is a dangerous retreat from the party’s core values. Historically, the Democratic Party was built on a coalition of working people, from factory workers in Michigan to coal miners in West Virginia. To abandon them now would mean surrendering to an aristocratic vision of politics where only the most educated and elite are deemed worthy of representation.
Moreover, leaving the working class to the GOP further entrenches a two-party system where one party serves corporations and the ultra-wealthy. In contrast, the other party, instead of fighting for the people, carves out a coalition of marginalized groups without addressing the root economic issues that affect all Americans. This not only exacerbates economic inequality but also weakens the progressive movement.
The Path Forward: A Bold, Working-Class Agenda
Instead of giving up on the working class, Democrats should embrace a bold, populist agenda that speaks directly to their needs. This includes:
- Universal Healthcare: Expand Medicare or implement a single-payer system to ensure no one is left bankrupt due to medical bills.
- Strong Unions: Strengthen workers’ rights and make unionizing easier, particularly in industries where corporations exploit workers.
- Economic Investment in Rural Areas: Bringing good-paying jobs back to small towns through infrastructure investments, green energy projects, and localized manufacturing.
- Campaign Finance Reform: Cutting corporate money out of politics so that working-class voters see Democrats as their true advocates, not just another corporate party.
- Fighting Corporate Greed: Holding big business accountable for price gouging, wage suppression, and union busting.
By focusing on these policies, Democrats can rebuild trust with working-class voters, whether they live in rural Kentucky, urban Detroit, or suburban Pennsylvania. It is not about pandering but proving through action that the party stands for the economic well-being of all people, not just the professional class. Trust is not rebuilt in one election cycle. It demands consistency.
Conclusion: Winning by Fighting for Everyone
Fareed Zakaria’s suggestion that Democrats should move on from the working class is not only wrong—it is antithetical to the principles of a genuinely democratic society. Writing off any demographic is a losing strategy, both morally and politically. Instead, the Democratic Party must return to its roots and make economic justice its primary mission. The only way to build a lasting majority is by standing with all working people—white, Black, Latino, urban, rural, unionized, and non-unionized. Only then can the Democratic Party genuinely claim to be the party of the people.
[/ppp_patron_only]
