A black woman enjoying a hockey game was distraught from a racist text sequence between DC Lobbyist Courtney Johnson, an Alpine Group Vice President, and Jimmy. She has been fired.
SAD: Courtney Johnson’s racist texts
Watch Politics Done Right T.V. here.
Podcasts (Video — Audio)
Summary
A Black woman attending a Washington Capitals hockey game witnessed Courtney Johnson, a white woman and DC lobbyist, exchanging racist texts with a person named “Jimmy.” The messages spread harmful stereotypes about Black people regarding crime, education, employment, and reproductive health. The texts culminated in genocidal rhetoric, which Johnson did not challenge. The woman documented the exchange, identified Johnson, and exposed her employer, Alpine Group, which responded by placing her on administrative leave. The incident underscores the prevalence of racism in influential spaces and the need for active confrontation of racist beliefs.
Key Takeaways
- A Black woman at a hockey game saw Courtney Johnson texting racist messages, including falsehoods about Black people and higher education.
- Johnson’s conversation partner, “Jimmy,” escalated to advocating genocide, which Johnson ignored rather than condemned.
- TikTok influencer Tizzyent exposed Johnson online, quickly identifying her as a senior vice president at a powerful DC lobbying firm.
- Alpine Group responded by placing Johnson on administrative leave, claiming her views contradicted their values.
- The incident highlights how systemic racism persists in elite circles and reinforces the need for dismantling racial misinformation.
This exposure of a high-powered lobbyist’s racist views is a stark reminder that bigotry is not confined to the uneducated or uninformed—it thrives in elite spaces that shape policy. The silence of those who tolerate racism is just as dangerous as the hate itself. Progress requires not just calling out individual offenders but dismantling the false narratives that fuel systemic discrimination. Only by confronting these prejudices head-on can society move toward real equity.
This story developed from TikTok user Tizzyent
Premium Content (Complimentary)
Racism in America has always thrived in insular spaces where ignorance festers. The recent exposure of Courtney Johnson, a high-powered DC lobbyist, exchanging blatantly racist text messages is not just an isolated incident of bigotry—it is a reflection of a deeper, systemic issue in American society. Johnson’s texts and her casual engagement with racist rhetoric reveal how deeply entrenched and normalized racism remains, even among people in positions of power. However, beyond just calling out individual racism, the real challenge lies in dismantling the misinformation and ill-informed beliefs that fuel these prejudices.
The Exposure: A Window into Private Racism
The incident unfolded when a Black woman attending a Washington Capitals hockey game noticed a white woman sitting in front of her texting racist messages to a person named “Jimmy.” The messages were deeply offensive, propagating false stereotypes about Black people regarding education, crime, employment, and even genocidal rhetoric. The casual nature of the conversation, with Johnson neither challenging nor showing concern for the heinous views expressed, highlights the everyday acceptability of such racist narratives within certain social circles.
The woman who witnessed the messages took swift action. She sent the pictures and video to TikTok influencer Tizzyent. He identified the texter as Courtney Johnson, a senior vice president at the prominent DC lobbying firm Alpine Group. The firm responded by placing Johnson on administrative leave, emphasizing that her statements were “inconsistent” with its values. While corporate damage control is a predictable response, it does not address the broader implications of how individuals like Johnson operate within institutions that influence policy, particularly in healthcare—an industry where racial disparities remain a persistent problem.
The Danger of Misinformation in Racism
At the heart of Johnson’s and Jimmy’s conversation lies a set of false narratives that have long been used to justify racial discrimination. The idea that Black people are inherently criminal, lazy, or intellectually inferior is rooted in centuries of white supremacist propaganda. These beliefs are not just offensive; they are categorically false, yet they continue to shape policies, policing, and economic structures in America.
For example, Johnson’s inference that Black people are more promiscuous and, therefore, more likely to become pregnant is not supported by data. In reality, studies show that sexual activity rates do not vary significantly across racial groups. The disparities in unplanned pregnancies stem largely from systemic issues such as unequal access to healthcare, contraception, and sex education. Similarly, the assertion that Black people are admitted to colleges with fewer qualifications than white students due to diversity efforts is another misrepresentation. The truth is that Black and Latino students face systemic barriers in education, from underfunded schools to discriminatory admissions policies that favor legacy applicants—who are overwhelmingly white.
The Systemic Impact of Private Racism in Public Policy
Johnson’s position of influence is one of the most alarming aspects of this case. As a top DC lobbyist specializing in healthcare policy, she likely had a hand in shaping legislation that affects millions of Americans. If someone with such overtly racist views holds sway over healthcare policies, how can the system be trusted to serve communities of color fairly? The racial disparities in maternal health, medical treatment, and healthcare access are already stark. If those crafting policies operate under the assumption that Black people are inherently less deserving or responsible for their hardships, the outcome will inevitably reinforce systemic inequities.
This is why merely condemning individual acts of racism is not enough. It is essential to challenge the structures that allow individuals with such views to wield power. Alpine Group’s response—placing Johnson on leave—may be a necessary step. Still, it does not address the broader issue of how many other decision-makers in Washington quietly share similar views but remain undiscovered.
The Role of White Fragility and Complacency
Perhaps the most disturbing part of this exchange was not just the hateful content but the lack of outrage from Johnson toward Jimmy’s genocidal comments. She did not challenge, condemn, or even react. This silence is emblematic of a broader problem in America: the passive acceptance of racism by those who consider themselves neutral.
The unwillingness of many white Americans to confront racism in their circles enables its continued existence. When faced with systemic inequities, too many choose denial or defensiveness instead of reflection and action. This is where progressive voices must push harder—not just to expose racism but to dismantle the conditions that allow it to persist.
Rejecting White Supremacy as a Tool of Division
White supremacy is not just a tool for oppressing people of color; it is a mechanism for dividing and controlling the broader working class. The ruling elite has historically used racial division to prevent solidarity among the oppressed. The false notion that Black people are unfairly benefiting from diversity initiatives is meant to stoke resentment among white Americans who are also struggling under economic inequality.
If working-class white, Black, Latino, and Asian Americans recognized their shared struggles against corporate greed, wage suppression, and healthcare inequality, they could collectively demand a more just system. But white supremacy functions as a distraction, keeping people focused on fighting each other instead of the real culprits: the economic and political elites who benefit from this division.
The Path Forward: Education, Accountability, and Unity
Society must commit to education and exposure to counteract the ignorance displayed by Johnson and Jimmy. Racism is not inherent; it is taught and perpetuated through misinformation. Breaking this cycle requires actively challenging racist beliefs, diversifying educational curriculums, and fostering cross-cultural engagement.
Moreover, there must be real consequences for those in power who hold and propagate racist views. A system that allows people like Johnson to shape policy unchecked is fundamentally broken. Organizations must not only remove individuals like her from positions of influence but also implement safeguards to ensure that racial bias does not inform decision-making.
Lastly, the fight against racism must be a collective effort. White Americans who recognize the toxicity of these ideologies have a responsibility to challenge them—not just in public but also within their social circles. Silence is complicity, and progress will only come when enough people are willing to disrupt the status quo.
Conclusion
Courtney Johnson’s exposure is not just about one racist woman in a DC lobbying firm—it is a case study in how deeply racism remains embedded in American institutions. While her removal may serve as a temporary fix, the real solution lies in dismantling the racist myths that sustain systemic oppression. Society can only move toward racial equity by confronting and correcting these falsehoods. Ignorance is the fuel of racism, and education is its antidote. The question is: Will enough people take the cure?
Viewers are encouraged to subscribe and join the conversation for more insightful commentary and to support progressive messages. Together, we can populate the internet with progressive messages that represent the true aspirations of most Americans.
