Trump’s actions exposes a constitution with severe defects.

For all who believe in the infallibility of our Constitution, Donald Trump is using every defect in it to enrich himself and others as he makes it an autocratic nation.

A defective Constitution?

Watch Politics Done Right T.V. here.

Podcasts (Video — Audio)

---

Summary

The video outlines how Donald Trump’s behavior as president and ongoing political ambitions reveal the severe structural weaknesses embedded in the U.S. Constitution. While the document has been revered as a democratic cornerstone, it has long depended on the goodwill of its interpreters rather than enforceable safeguards. The speaker argues that Trump’s authoritarian tendencies, along with a complicit Congress and an impotent judiciary, expose a constitutional crisis already in motion. This system, built on myths of coequal branches and civic virtue, is failing to prevent democratic backsliding as elites continue to exploit power unchecked.

Five Key Bullet Points:

• The U.S. Constitution, historically flawed from inception (e.g., Three-Fifths Compromise), has always relied on people acting in good faith, not legal safeguards.
• Donald Trump’s disregard for democratic norms has pushed the system to its limits, revealing the Constitution’s inability to curb authoritarianism.
• The myth of “coequal branches” of government breaks down when Congress refuses to act and the judiciary lacks enforcement power.
• The Supreme Court and lower federal courts are dependent on the executive branch to enforce rulings—something Trump has threatened to ignore.
• Americans remain largely unaware or powerless, distracted by daily survival, while political elites and corporate interests consolidate power behind the scenes.

From a progressive perspective, this crisis is not just about one corrupt leader—it’s about a political system rigged to favor the powerful at the expense of democracy. Trump’s rise merely peeled back the illusion that the Constitution can protect the people from tyranny. In reality, it is a 200-year-old framework desperately in need of reinvention. Without bold, systemic reform—driven by grassroots movements and progressive leadership—the same tools designed to liberate can and will continue to be used to oppress.

---

Premium Content (Complimentary)

Donald Trump’s continued political relevance and his overt efforts to undermine democratic norms have exposed the profound structural defects in the U.S. Constitution. While America has long romanticized its founding document as a beacon of liberty and justice, recent years have proven that the Constitution is not only imperfect but structurally incapable of defending democracy from authoritarian exploitation. What we are witnessing today is not merely the result of one man’s ambitions but the outcome of a constitutional system designed with deep flaws—flaws that progressive voices have long warned against but that now threaten the very survival of the republic.

At best, the U.S. Constitution has always been a compromise document—crafted by elites who sought to preserve a hierarchical order while projecting the veneer of democratic self-governance. From the beginning, it was marred by morally bankrupt compromises like the infamous Three-Fifths Clause, which codified human slavery into the very foundation of American law. That compromise—wherein an enslaved Black person counted as three-fifths of a human being for purposes of congressional representation—was not an aberration but a symptom of a deeper sickness: the elevation of white, male property rights above all else.

Though subsequent amendments corrected some of these original sins, the basic structure remains vulnerable. It relies not on rigorous safeguards but on the assumption of good faith and mutual respect among those in power. This assumption has proven fatally naïve in the age of Trump. The Constitution does not prevent an authoritarian from seizing power; it merely hopes that such a person will never emerge—or that if they do, other branches of government will act responsibly to stop them.

However, as Trump has shown, those branches often do not act. Congress, theoretically a coequal branch, has proven unwilling to check executive power, especially when controlled by the president’s own party. The impeachment process—requiring a majority in the House and a two-thirds vote in the Senate—sets an unreasonably high bar for removing a dangerous president. Trump’s acquittals, despite overwhelming evidence of misconduct, underscore the point: political loyalty and cowardice have triumphed over constitutional duty.

Meanwhile, the judiciary, including the Supreme Court, theoretically exists to ensure laws are constitutional. However, the courts have no enforcement mechanism. They rely on the executive branch to carry out rulings. If the president refuses, the system breaks down. Under Trump, courts were ignored, subpoenas flouted, and norms shredded. The executive’s power over law enforcement—combined with a politicized and often impotent Congress—renders the judiciary’s authority toothless when faced with an uncooperative executive.

This dynamic is no accident. The Constitution does not provide precise mechanisms for dealing with a president who simply refuses to obey the law. There is no independent enforcement arm. The founders did not anticipate a president who would view the law as optional or transactional. Nor did they anticipate the rise of a cult of personality that would turn one man’s base into a political shield, insulating him from accountability.

Even worse, the current Court—stacked with ideological extremists thanks to Mitch McConnell’s procedural sabotage—has become an accomplice. It has issued decisions that empower corporate interests, weaken voting rights, and erode the separation between church and state. It now stands as a gatekeeper, not of justice but of minority rule. Like the Constitution’s, its legitimacy is crumbling under the weight of partisan manipulation.

The result is a system rigged against the majority. As long as the Electoral College, gerrymandering, the filibuster, and the Senate’s small-state bias persist, a minority of reactionary voters can dominate national policy. Trump’s continued grip on the Republican Party—and his potential return to power—exemplifies this danger. He and his enablers openly embrace authoritarianism, threaten to weaponize federal agencies against political enemies, and seek to dismantle checks and balances. And the Constitution, as currently structured, is ill-equipped to stop them.

The progressive response must be twofold. First, it must involve relentless public education. Americans need to understand that the Constitution is not sacred scripture but a living document—one that requires critical scrutiny and reform. Second, there must be a movement for structural change: abolishing the Electoral College, expanding the Supreme Court, ending partisan gerrymandering, and enshrining voting rights in law. These are not radical ideas; they are necessary steps to rescue democracy from the brink.

As the host highlights, most Americans are busy surviving—working long hours, raising families, and navigating economic precarity. But that’s exactly why the system persists: because those with power count on public exhaustion and distraction. It is up to progressives to break through that fog, to elevate the stakes, and to remind the public that the Constitution is not self-correcting. It is only as strong as the people willing to defend it.

In conclusion, Trump is not the cause of America’s constitutional crisis—he is the symptom. His rise has illuminated just how fragile and unfinished the American democratic project remains. And unless bold action is taken to reform the Constitution and the system it upholds, the next authoritarian will not be testing the boundaries of the law. They will be erasing them entirely.