When we shipped jobs overseas, the working class paid. Trump now uses tariffs to pay for his tax cuts for the rich and to bring back manufacturing.
Trump’s tariffs penalize the working class.
Watch Politics Done Right T.V. here.
Podcasts (Video — Audio)
Summary
The host deconstructs how corporate America, not foreign nations, is primarily responsible for the erosion of American manufacturing and the economic pain inflicted on the working class. Through outsourcing, supply chain fragility, and exploitative pricing practices, corporations enrich themselves while shifting the burden of their decisions onto everyday Americans. Rather than correcting this imbalance, Trump’s tariffs only worsen it by taxing consumers instead of addressing systemic corporate greed. The speaker proposes that public enterprise could serve as a corrective force to counterbalance the unchecked avarice of privatized capitalism.
Key Points:
- Exporting jobs equals importing poverty: Corporations moved production overseas to exploit cheap labor and lax regulations, devastating U.S. manufacturing towns and driving down domestic wages.
- Tariffs backfire on the people: Rather than punishing China or helping workers, Trump’s tariffs increased costs for American consumers and small businesses, effectively taxing the working class.
- Supply chain fragility harms the public: Relying on just-in-time inventory and overseas production leaves the U.S. vulnerable to global disruptions, with price hikes hitting consumers hardest.
- False scarcity increases profits: Corporations use disruptions to justify price increases even when production costs haven’t changed, exacerbating inequality while padding profits.
- Public enterprise as a solution: Government-owned factories in select areas abused by the corporatists and infrastructure could stabilize supply chains, create jobs, and check corporate greed without the pressure of shareholder profit.
This segment powerfully exposes the structural injustice in America’s economic model, where corporate decisions are shielded from accountability while working families pay the price. Trump’s tariffs, rather than helping, reveal a deeper rot—one that can only be addressed through democratic economic reform. A government that truly serves the people must reclaim its role as a builder, a stabilizer, and a guardian against corporate exploitation.
Premium Content (Complimentary)
Donald Trump’s protectionist economic policy—most notably his widespread imposition of tariffs—was marketed as a nationalist triumph for the American worker. But peel away the populist rhetoric, and what emerges is a classic bait-and-switch: working-class Americans, especially those in rural and industrial communities, continue to bear the costs of decisions made by a corporate elite whose loyalty lies not with laborers in the Rust Belt or farmers in the Midwest, but with their shareholders and bottom lines.
The False Savior of Tariffs
Trump’s tariffs, particularly those on Chinese goods, were sold as tools to bring jobs back and punish China for its trade practices. However, the reality is that tariffs are taxes, which disproportionately fall on consumers and workers rather than on the multinational corporations that outsourced American jobs in the first place. When Trump slapped tariffs on goods, American importers paid the duties—not Chinese exporters. Those costs are passed directly on to everyday consumers through higher prices. American consumers and businesses—not China—shouldered over 90% of the tariff burden.
Moreover, Trump’s trade war failed in its most basic objective: it did not bring back the manufacturing jobs he promised. In fact, by early 2020, before the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the economy, manufacturing employment had begun to stagnate. The Economic Policy Institute and Brookings Institution reported that Trump’s trade war with China cost the U.S. economy approximately 300,000 jobs, many of which were concentrated in export-reliant sectors like agriculture, automotive, and electronics.
Globalization Was a Corporate Choice, Not a Necessity
The rationale behind outsourcing was never about humanitarian aid to developing countries. It was and remains about maximizing profits by minimizing costs. Corporations fled American soil for cheaper labor and fewer environmental regulations—not because they had to, but because it served their financial interests. Textile factories in the Carolinas, steel mills in Pennsylvania, and electronics plants in Ohio shuttered not due to inevitability but because corporate boardrooms chose short-term gains over community sustainability.
As the host observes, this exodus decimated working-class communities, driving down wages and destabilizing entire regions. The supply chain became increasingly fragile, vulnerable to natural disasters, pandemics, and geopolitical shifts. And when that chain broke—whether due to COVID-19 or extreme weather—the working class paid again, facing product shortages and skyrocketing prices while CEOs watched their net worth soar.
The “just-in-time-inventory” model that corporations embraced made everything more efficient on paper, but it sacrificed resilience. When the system broke down, there were no stockpiles, no backup plans—only more price hikes, which translated into yet another upward redistribution of wealth.
The Manufactured Crisis of Scarcity
One of the most galling elements of this cycle is the false scarcity corporations use to extract even more from the public. When supply chain delays occur, the cost of goods doesn’t necessarily rise on the production side, especially if those goods were already manufactured at exploitative wages in overseas factories. Yet corporations raise prices anyway, citing “supply chain issues,” and pocket the difference. As a result, the same garment made for pennies in Bangladesh can suddenly be sold at double the price in a Walmart in Wisconsin—not because it costs more to make, but because the illusion of scarcity makes it more profitable.
This is not market efficiency; this is legalized extortion. It is also enabled by a political class that is too often captured by corporate interests, as demonstrated by both parties’ historic willingness to sign free trade deals without worker protections or environmental standards.
A Progressive Alternative: Public Enterprise as a Check on Greed
What’s the progressive solution? Contrary to the right-wing boogeyman of “communism,” the answer is not complete state control over the economy. Instead, it is about strategic public investment and ownership in key sectors as a counterweight to unchecked corporate greed. The government can and should establish public enterprises in areas where the private sector has failed to protect national resilience and equity—such as energy, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, and even broadband infrastructure.
A publicly owned factory doesn’t pay obscene executive bonuses. It doesn’t answer to Wall Street. It answers to the public. This means lower costs, more reliable supply chains, and jobs that pay decent wages. If a private company wants to compete, it’s welcome to—but it must do so by matching public value, not by cutting corners and exploiting labor abroad.
This isn’t about socialism versus capitalism. It’s about democracy versus oligarchy. It’s about creating an economy that serves the many, not the few. Countries like Norway, Finland, and even Germany have long employed hybrid models that blend public ownership with private enterprise, ensuring that national interests aren’t held hostage by a handful of billionaires.
The Path Forward
Working-class Americans must stop being the cannon fodder in battles between governments and corporations. Tariffs that fail to address the root causes of economic dislocation only worsen inequality. Real reform means reimagining globalization, holding corporations accountable, and investing in public goods that build economic resilience from the ground up.
Progressives understand that the problem is not trade itself but who it serves. When multinational interests dictate trade policy, the people lose. But when trade policy is shaped by workers, communities, and the public good, it becomes a tool for shared prosperity.
It’s time to stop scapegoating the victims and start taxing and regulating the culprits. The rich created this crisis. The working class shouldn’t have to pay for it.
Viewers are encouraged to subscribe and join the conversation for more insightful commentary and to support progressive messages. Together, we can populate the internet with progressive messages that represent the true aspirations of most Americans.
