Fmr. Pence’s COF Marc Short started a new GOP false talking point to discredit AOC and Bernie Sanders, who are reaching millions with their Fighting Oligarchy tour, by claiming Trump’s policies are theirs.
New GOP false talking point.
Watch Politics Done Right T.V. here.
Podcasts (Video — Audio)
Summary
Republican strategist Marc Short attempts to counter the growing “Fighting Oligarchy Tour” by Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, claiming on NBC that Donald Trump is already implementing their agenda—a claim intended to confuse voters and dilute progressive momentum.
- Short tells Meet the Press that Trump’s trade wars and talk of tax hikes on some companies mirror Sanders‑style economics.
- He argues the Tea Party’s small‑government zeal contrasts with today’s left‑wing “energy,” which he dismisses as “unserious.”
- Short insists the Democratic Party looks disorganized, calling Joe Biden “the gift that keeps on giving” for Republicans.
- Host Kristen Welker and other panelists essentially let the false comparison pass without challenging its factual basis.
- Progressive activists warn the GOP will keep repeating this narrative to brand Sanders‑style populism a failure if Trump’s policies falter.
Short’s spin is a classic bait‑and‑switch: Trump guts Medicaid, props up billionaires, and weaponizes tariffs that punish workers, while Sanders and AOC call for universal health care, fair taxes, and labor power. Progressives must hit back instantly—naming the big‑money interests Trump protects and spotlighting how real populism lifts working people, not corporate oligarchs.
Premium Content (Complimentary)
Marc Short’s weekend appearance on NBC’s Meet the Press crystallized the Republican Party’s latest messaging experiment: tell the public that Donald Trump’s economic program is the program of Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio‑Cortez. It is a sleight of hand designed to shatter the growing, cross‑partisan enthusiasm the two progressives are generating on their “Fighting Oligarchy Tour” and to inoculate conservatives against the political backlash Trump’s recession‑threatening agenda is already unleashing. Yet the claim collapses on first inspection, and progressives have every reason—and every obligation—to expose the ploy.
The size and energy of the “Fighting Oligarchy Tour” crowds explain why Republican operatives feel rattled. In deep‑red Folsom, California, more than 30,000 people filled a district Trump carried comfortably in 2024, cheering calls to curb billionaire power and expand social programs. Four days later, in Missoula, Montanans braved snow flurries to watch Sanders, Ocasio‑Cortez, and local union leaders eviscerate the myth that corporate wealth translates into shared prosperity. Even centrist strategists now publicly advise Democrats to embrace that populist economics as “a prerequisite for coming back to power,” arguing that pocketbook solidarity, not triangulation, animates voters. Short’s false equivalence, therefore, functions primarily as damage control: if Trump can be painted as the accidental vehicle for Sanders‑style populism, Republican consultants hope to blunt the tour’s momentum.
Reality makes that impossible. Start with trade. Trump’s scatter‑shot tariffs have ricocheted through supply chains, triggering lawsuits from West Coast chambers of commerce and leaving small manufacturers begging for relief. Independent studies show that tariffs raise costs while failing to revive domestic employment; economists note that productivity, not imports, has erased most factory jobs over the decades. Sanders, by contrast, demands enforceable labor and climate standards, international wage boards, and public investment in green industry policies that lift workers on both sides of the border rather than pitting them against one another. Calling Trump’s corporate‑friendly protectionism “Bernie trade” ignores the class lens that defines the senator’s entire worldview.
Tax policy exposes an even starker divide. Trump’s 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act slashed the corporate rate from 35 percent to 21 percent and showered the top quintile with permanent windfalls; by 2027, the wealthiest Americans will capture every penny of the law’s benefits. Sanders and Ocasio‑Cortez champion a marginal 70 percent rate on income above $10 million, a wealth tax on fortunes over $50 million, and a windfall‑profits levy on fossil‑fuel giants—each measure explicitly reversing the upward redistribution the TCJA accelerated. Marc Short pretends not to notice those numbers because acknowledging them would concede the obvious: Trump protects oligarchs, while the progressives confronting them on stage propose to tax them.
The safety‑net debate is equally revealing. House Republicans, working with the Trump administration’s budget office, have proposed as much as $880 billion in Medicaid cuts over the next decade, alongside new work requirements that would push millions off coverage. Simultaneously, they aim to extend and even deepen the TCJA’s expensive tax loopholes. Meanwhile, Sanders continues to press Medicare for All—an overhaul that would shield every resident from medical bankruptcy and negotiate drug prices directly with pharmaceutical monopolies. To suggest that an administration plotting to hollow out Medicaid has somehow embraced Sanders’s health‑care ethic is not merely dishonest; it is Orwellian.
Why, then, does the media sometimes let the framing slip by? Part of the answer lies in newsroom habit: press outlets spent a decade normalizing Trump’s populist rhetoric without interrogating the corporate substance underneath. Cable roundtables often prize “balance” over precision, allowing operatives like Short to launder spin into the discourse unchallenged. Progressive guests must therefore arrive armed with data and ready to redirect the conversation toward material facts—tariff‑induced layoffs, tax‑cut windfalls, and Medicaid enrollment losses—whenever the right deploys this rhetorical jujitsu.
The stakes extend beyond a single sound bite. If Republicans succeed in fusing Trumpism and Sandersism in the public imagination, they will simultaneously deflect accountability for recessionary policies and tarnish the very alternatives that could rescue working families. Progressives must pre‑empt that fusion by hammering home the class character of every primary policy choice. They must remind rural entrepreneurs harmed by tariff whiplash that Sanders proposes targeted export credits and cooperative lending, not blanket levies. They must remind suburban parents scrambling to afford insulin that Medicare for All—and only Medicare for All—reins in drug profiteering. And they must spotlight the contradiction of a president who rails against elites while handing billionaires tax cuts more significant than the entire annual budget for the Centers for Disease Control.
Marc Short’s gambit ultimately confirms the movement’s traction. When oligarchs feel the ground shift, they seek to muddy the fault lines. By tracing each false parallel back to the ledger of winners and losers, progressives can keep the picture clear: Trump governs for the one percent; Sanders and Ocasio‑Cortez organize the ninety‑nine. No amount of rhetorical fog can obscure that daylight once the numbers—and the lived experience of millions—come roaring into view.
Viewers are encouraged to subscribe and join the conversation for more insightful commentary and to support progressive messages. Together, we can populate the internet with progressive messages that represent the true aspirations of most Americans.
