Trump promised to fight for the working class, but instead, he, Elon Musk, and RFK Jr. are attacking health services and programs that keep the middle class and working class healthy.
Trump’s budget cuts will destroy public health.
Watch Politics Done Right T.V. here.
Podcasts (Video — Audio)
Summary
The host details how the Trump administration’s draft budget—echoed in an exposé at Common Dreams—would gut public health programs, slash CDC and NIH funding by 40 percent, and endanger rural hospitals, all while hiding behind Project 2025’s blueprint to outsource government services for the benefit of billionaires. He warns that these cuts imperil disease surveillance, exacerbate health inequities, and funnel the savings into tax breaks and weapons contracts, urging listeners across the political spectrum to flood Congress with resistance before the plan takes hold.
- Proposes cutting HHS from $121 billion to about $80 billion, wiping out CDC chronic-disease and HIV programs.
- Eliminates rural-health grants, hospital flexibility funds, and physician-residency incentives—undermining care where it is already scarce.
- Consolidates remaining agencies into a politicized “Administration for a Healthy America,” firing thousands of scientists.
- Follows Project 2025’s roadmap, trading preventive care for corporate tax giveaways and unchecked Pentagon spending.
- Host calls for united, relentless constituent pressure to block the budget, framing public health as non-negotiable infrastructure.
Progressive takeaway: This budget is not fiscal “streamlining” but a transfer of wealth and power from working families to oligarchs. Progressives see in it the neoliberal playbook laid bare—privatize gain, socialize pain—and thus press for mass organizing, robust public investment, and a health-care system that treats human life as a public good rather than a line item.
Premium Content (Complimentary)
The Trump administration’s draft budget lays bare a governing philosophy that treats public health infrastructure as a disposable line item rather than a life-saving public good. Internal documents leaked to Common Dreams show a 40 percent reduction for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), shrinking the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) from roughly $121 billion to about $80 billion in a single fiscal year. Epidemiologist Ellie Murray calls the plan “a cut that big would destroy public health,” and the numbers leave little room for doubt.
The Washington Post independently confirmed that the CDC’s budget would tumble from $9.2 billion to about $5.2 billion, eliminating every chronic-disease program, all domestic HIV work, and the agency’s signature global-health center—the very division that once detected SARS, Ebola, and COVID-19 flare-ups abroad before they reached U.S. shores. In the same breath, the administration proposes a new “Administration for a Healthy America” (AHA) that siphons what remains of those programs into a central office run directly out of the political suite at HHS. Independent analysts at Fierce Healthcare note that the AHA would receive about $14 billion—far less than the work it is supposed to inherit—while the NIH’s research budget crashes from $47 billion to $27 billion. Structural consolidation under the Orwellian-sounding “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) is expected to further strip away 20,000 public-sector jobs, according to the Economic Policy Institute. In practice, the administration fires the scientists first and hands the remainder over to political appointees who lack the bandwidth to manage basic disease surveillance.
Rural America bears the most severe impact. Grants that keep small hospitals solvent, residency stipends that lure young physicians to farm country, and critical programs such as the Black Lung Clinics and Rural Hospital Flexibility grants disappear outright. Infectious Disease Advisor reports that even injury-prevention initiatives—gun-violence research, childhood drowning studies, and traumatic-brain-injury registries—vanish from the ledger. The irony is cruel: MAGA regions that delivered Trump’s electoral college firewall suffer disproportionate hospital closures, longer emergency-response times, and higher maternal-mortality rates once the very subsidies they rely upon evaporate.
The administration defends these cuts as “streamlining,” yet the policy threads tie back to Project 2025, a Heritage Foundation blueprint that re-imagines government as a privatized patronage machine. Under this doctrine, public health funds become a piggy bank for tax cuts that overwhelmingly favor the billionaire class. Politico’s Pulse newsletter discloses that HIV initiatives alone face termination to make room for a 30 percent agency cut—a choice that trades antiretroviral access for capital-gains windfalls. In other words, the White House raids vaccine lines so Wall Street can raid treasury lines.
Progressives argue that the long-term math never adds up. Every dollar spent on vaccination saves the economy an estimated $10 in avoided medical bills and lost wages; NIH-funded breakthroughs seed roughly $1 trillion in downstream pharmaceutical innovation every decade. Get rid of those pipelines and the nation pays twice: first through resurgent diseases like measles or high-cost chronic illnesses such as diabetes, and second through lost biomedical leadership as China and the EU sprint ahead. Even the Congressional Budget Office—no bastion of left-wing activism—has repeatedly demonstrated that preventive-health spending bends the cost curve far more efficiently than supply-side tax cuts.
The public-health rollback also undermines national security. Retired admirals and generals warned during the COVID-19 era that disease morbidity can sideline military readiness as surely as any hostile power. Slashing the CDC’s global health operations invites blind spots in pathogen monitoring, hamstringing early warning systems that once served as America’s health radar. That danger intensifies in a warming world, where climate-driven zoonotic spillovers are on the rise.
Given this reality, progressive policymakers advance a diametrically opposite agenda: fortify HHS with robust, mandatory funding; expand Medicare through Medicare for All to cover all residents; and invest in a twenty-first-century public health corps that treats epidemiology as critical infrastructure, akin to bridges or broadband. Democrats in Congress have already drafted the Health Infrastructure Investment Act, which directs a penny-per-dollar wealth tax surtax to rural clinic upgrades and universal childhood immunizations, effectively turning the revenue from inequality into community resilience. Such proposals echo the New Deal’s Rural Electrification Administration, which once delivered power lines to farms the private market refused to serve.
Ultimately, the budget fight becomes a moral referendum on what kind of country the United States chooses to be. A government that de-funds infant-hearing screenings while green-lighting another round of corporate tax holidays broadcasts its priorities with brutal clarity. Trump’s cuts do not reflect a sober cost-benefit calculus; they embody a worldview that devalues collective well-being in service of private gain. Citizens who understand that stakes must demand more—not less—public investment, and they must do so before another pandemic or opioid-overdose spike provides the fatal proof that an underfunded public-health system costs far more than it ever saves.
