Scott Pelley of 60 Minutes fame did not mince his words as he slammed Trump’s attack on education, freedom, and much more.
60 Minutes’ Scott Pelley nails Trump
Watch Politics Done Right T.V. here.
Podcasts (Video — Audio)
Summary
Scott Pelley’s commencement address to Wake Forest University’s Class of 2025 warns that the nation’s foundational institutions—the rule of law, journalism, universities, and free expression—now face coordinated assault. Without naming Donald Trump, the veteran 60 Minutes correspondent urges graduates to become “fierce defenders of democracy” and reject the fear that authoritarians cultivate to silence truth-seekers.
- Pelley declares that “journalism, universities, and freedom of speech are under attack,” framing the moment as a democratic crisis rather than routine partisan friction.
- He links contemporary threats to historic struggles, invoking George Orwell and Maya Angelou while reminding students that Wake Forest integrated in 1962 despite Jim Crow repression.
- The speech highlights three modern exemplars—Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Nobel laureate Nadia Murad, and surgeon Samer Attar—to show how moral courage can defeat autocracy and terror.
- Right-wing outlets quickly weaponize the remarks, labeling them an “anti-Trump tirade” and accusing CBS of politicizing commencement. The backlash amplifies the address online, a textbook Streisand-effect moment.
- The controversy unfolds as Trump sues CBS for up to $10 billion and moves to strip NPR and PBS of federal funds—evidence that attacks on independent media are no abstract warning but an immediate policy project.
Pelley’s challenge lands squarely in progressive territory: he calls on new graduates to meet reactionary power with organized truth-telling, inclusive solidarity, and unflinching civic engagement—an antidote to the authoritarian creep of Trumpism.
Premium Content (Complimentary)
Scott Pelley stands on Wake Forest University’s Quad like a modern Edward R. Murrow, calmly surveying a landscape that again trembles under the boots of demagogues. In crisp, urgent prose, he names what many corporate outlets still euphemize: authoritarian forces in the United States now menace the very pillars that keep democracy upright. His language deliberately refrains from partisan score-settling and instead traces a straight line from Orwell’s warnings to contemporary gag orders against college journalists, from fascist blitzkriegs over London to Trump-era lawsuits designed to bankrupt critical newsrooms.
Pelley’s critique is more than a rhetorical flourish; it is rooted in a pattern of state-backed intimidation that progressives have tracked for years. Donald Trump’s second term began with executive orders threatening to defund NPR and PBS, public institutions that millions rely on for fact-based reporting. NPR responded by suing to block what its attorneys call a “blatant First-Amendment violation.” Concurrently, Trump’s lawyers press a multibillion-dollar claim against CBS, accusing 60 Minutes of deceptively editing an interview with Vice President Harris. Independent legal analysts note that the lawsuit rides Texas consumer-protection statutes rather than defamation law, a creative ploy to chill investigative journalism through costly discovery.
Against that backdrop, Pelley’s commencement call to arms feels less like graduation boilerplate and more like a strategic mobilization. He invokes Zelenskyy’s selfie-defiance on Kyiv’s streets to illustrate how truth, when spoken plainly and courageously, can organize millions against tyranny. Nadia Murad’s transformation from ISIS captive to Nobel laureate shows that the marginalized can seize narrative power, precisely what anti-woke politicians now fear in campus diversity initiatives. Dr. Samer Attar’s battlefield surgeries in Gaza and Ukraine rebuke the cynicism of leaders who reduce human suffering to geopolitical chess. By stitching these global stories to an American stage, Pelley reminds graduates that silencing at home is part of the same authoritarian playbook repressing dissent abroad.
Conservative media swiftly answered with outrage, proving his point. Fox News hosts framed the speech as a “leftist rant,” lamenting that a celebratory day was “politicized.” The Daily Beast, tracing right-wing social-media meltdowns, observed how MAGA influencers attempted—yet failed—to stifle viral clips of Pelley’s warning. Their fury inadvertently broadened the audience for a message they detest: that authoritarianism thrives on ignorance and fear, and both can be defeated only when ordinary people refuse to look away.
Progressives reading the moment see a moral clarity absent from most network journalism since Trump’s reelection. Pelley does not traffic in both-sides equivocation; he speaks in the active voice of accountability. He names the real stakes: when power criminalizes “diversity,” rewrites history books, or dispatches masked agents to abduct student journalists, democracy hemorrhages. The remedy, he insists, is fearless solidarity—the same solidarity that powered the Civil Rights Movement and compelled Wake Forest to integrate when segregation still ruled the South.
This message resonates beyond academia. Labor organizers battling union-busting campaigns, environmentalists fighting fossil-fuel giants, and reproductive-rights advocates resisting draconian bans all face the same structural hostility that Pelley outlines. For them, the commencement speech is a secular sermon: knowledge without action cedes ground to oppressors; moral conviction paired with collective courage can redraw the map of power.
In a media ecosystem where corporate executives mull appeasing Trump to secure mergers or stave off regulatory threats, Pelley’s exhortation to “run with the baton” feels both journalistic and civic. It signals that reporters must reject timidity, universities must safeguard open inquiry, and graduates must wield degrees not as status symbols but as licenses to challenge entrenched privilege.
Ultimately, Pelley hands the Class of 2025—and, by extension, every citizen—a radical yet pragmatic assignment: speak facts in public, defend institutions that democratize knowledge, and refuse to let fear colonize private thought. That is a progressive blueprint rooted not in dogma but in the empirical lesson that authoritarianism withers under sustained daylight. Trumpism may sue, smear, and censor, but history favors the multitudes who rise, again and again, to complete the unfinished work of liberty.
Viewers are encouraged to subscribe and join the conversation for more insightful commentary and to support progressive messages. Together, we can populate the internet with progressive messages that represent the true aspirations of most Americans.
