Jasmine Crockett paraphrases Sen. Joni Ernst perfectly: You elected me to help you dig your grave.

Jasmine Crockett paraphrased Sen. Joni Ernst as saying she helped dig the graves of her constituents. Red States have already killed many by not accepting the Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act.

Jasmine Crockett paraphrases Sen. Joni Ernst.

Watch Politics Done Right T.V. here.

Podcasts (Video — Audio)

---

Summary

In a tense Iowa town hall, Sen. Joni Ernst dismissed a constituent’s fear that Medicaid cuts would cost lives with the retort, “We all are going to die.” Rep. Jasmine Crockett later distilled the moment on MSNBC, charging that Republicans have effectively told voters, “You elected me to help you dig your grave,” a phrase that now encapsulates the GOP’s accelerating assault on public health and social safety nets.

• Flippant fatalism: Ernst’s “we all are going to die” remark came as she defended a House-passed budget that slashes Medicaid and SNAP, provoking groans from constituents and national backlash.
• Crockett’s sharp rejoinder: Rep. Crockett framed Ernst’s attitude as an elected official helping constituents “dig [their] grave,” spotlighting the human stakes of the GOP budget.
• Broader GOP indifference: At other town halls, Reps. Mike Flood and Ashley Hinson admitted ignorance of the bill’s details yet still supported it, underscoring a pattern of reckless governance.
• Media myopia: Mainstream outlets fixated on Ernst’s gaffe but largely sidestepped deeper coverage of state-level refusals to expand Medicaid that have already cost thousands of lives.
• Evidence of harm: Peer-reviewed research shows Medicaid expansion reduces all-cause mortality by roughly 20 deaths per 100,000 adults, while comprehensive reviews find a 3-4 % drop in fatalities overall; rolling those gains back will be deadly.

Rep. Crockett’s blunt paraphrase crystallizes a truth progressives have warned about for years: conservative austerity is not an abstract fiscal tweak—it is a deliberate policy choice that shortens working-class lives while padding corporate profits.

---

Premium Content (Complimentary)

Sen. Joni Ernst’s now-viral declaration—“we all are going to die”—should have been a moment of soul-searching for a party that markets itself as “pro-life.” Instead, it revealed the ideological core of modern conservatism: shrugging at preventable deaths so long as donors secure another tax cut. Ernst’s aside, delivered when pressed about Medicaid cuts in President Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” was no mere slip of the tongue; it was the quiet part spoken with startling candor, laying bare a governing philosophy that treats human beings as expendable line items.

Rep. Jasmine Crockett, the freshman firebrand from Texas, seized the moment on MSNBC. With surgical precision, she translated Ernst’s fatalism into plain English: “You elected me to help you dig your grave.” The line ricocheted across social media because it distilled years of Republican policy into nine devastating words. Whether blocking Medicaid expansion in red states, capping SNAP benefits, or gutting the Affordable Care Act, the GOP’s fiscal crusade consistently shifts health-care costs onto the poor and sick while subsidizing the wealthy.

The magnitude of that choice is measurable. A landmark New England Journal of Medicine study found that states that embraced the ACA’s Medicaid expansion cut mortality by 19.6 deaths for every 100,000 adults—tangible proof that coverage saves lives. A Kaiser Family Foundation meta-analysis encompassing more than 400 peer-reviewed papers confirmed those findings, documenting a 3.6 % drop in all-cause deaths and notable reductions in racial disparities after expansion. In the ten holdout states—led by Texas, Florida, and Georgia—an estimated 2 million low-income adults remain uninsured. Each year of inaction, therefore, represents a statistical massacre masquerading as fiscal prudence.

Ernst’s response is especially galling when juxtaposed with the lived reality of her constituents. Iowa adopted Medicaid expansion in 2014, resulting in a significant reduction in its uninsured rate to single digits. Rolling back coverage would endanger roughly 250,000 Iowans—many elderly, disabled, or working multiple jobs without employer insurance. Yet Ernst chose to mock a voter’s fear rather than defend their health.

The episode also exposes a persistent media failure. Corporate outlets obsessed over Ernst’s tone while largely ignoring the structural violence baked into the GOP budget: caps on Medicaid growth that shift $1.6 trillion to the states over ten years, block grants that decimate rural hospitals, and work requirements that function as paperwork purges rather than pathways to employment. By chasing viral soundbites, journalists risk obscuring a policy story written in preventable funerals.

Progressives understand that health care is a public good, not a commodity. They point to data from the Commonwealth Fund showing that the United States already spends almost twice as much per capita on healthcare as peer nations, yet ranks last in access, equity, and outcomes. The solution is not to shovel more Americans into private-insurance gravesites but to expand the public provision of care—whether through Medicare for All or, at minimum, universal Medicaid expansion paired with aggressive price controls on pharmaceuticals and hospital billing.

Critics call such proposals unaffordable, but the numbers tell a different story. The Congressional Budget Office has repeatedly shown that single-payer systems can save trillions of dollars in administrative waste and increase negotiating power. Meanwhile, each uninsured preventable death costs families irreplaceable loved ones and the economy billions in lost productivity. An ideology that views those losses as acceptable collateral is not fiscally conservative; it is morally bankrupt.

Ernst’s shrug and Crockett’s rejoinder thus mark a clash between two moral universes. One accepts premature death as the price of doing business. The other insists that a wealthy nation can and must guarantee health, dignity, and longevity to every resident. In that contest, data, ethics, and basic human empathy align with the progressive vision. Voters who recoil at grave-digging politics have a clear path forward: elect representatives who will build a health-care system designed to save lives, not bury them.

If the United States chooses the latter path, Ernst’s infamous remark will be remembered not as a cynical prophecy but as a turning-point warning—one that spurred a movement to ensure that no American’s life is forfeited on the altar of austerity.