EgbertoWillies.com

Political involvement should be a requirement for citizenship

  • Home
    • Homepage
    • Login
    • About Us
    • Bio
    • Research
      • BallotPedia
      • Bureau of Labor Statistics
      • CallMyCongress
      • LegiScan
      • OpenSecrets.org
      • Texas Legislature Online
      • US Dept; Of Health & Human Services
      • US Dept. of Labor
      • VoteSmart
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
  • Shows
    • Live TV
    • Move to Amend Reports
    • Politics Done Right
  • Books
  • Articles
    • AlterNet
    • CNN iReports
    • CommonDreams
    • DailyKos
    • Medium
    • OpEdNews
    • Substack
  • Activism
    • Battleground Texas
    • Coffee Party
    • Move To Amend
    • OccupyMovement
  • Social
    • BlueSky
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
  • Sections
    • Environment
    • Food And Cooking
    • Health
    • Local News
    • Odd News
    • People Making A Difference
    • Political
    • Reviews
      • Book Reviews
      • Books I Recommend
      • Product Reviews
    • Sports
    • Substack Notes
  • Donate
  • Store

Danielle Moodie Breaks Down Why America Still Isn’t Ready for a Woman President

November 19, 2025 By Egberto Willies

Danielle Moodie delivers a sharp analysis of Michelle Obama’s claim that America isn’t ready for a woman president, exposing the misogyny and racism still shaping U.S. politics.

Why America Still Isn’t Ready for a Woman President

Watch Politics Done Right T.V. here.


Podcasts (Video — Audio)

Summary

Danielle Moodie delivers a sharp, unflinching analysis of Michelle Obama’s assertion that America still resists electing a woman president. She identifies entrenched misogyny and racism as the dual barriers shaping voter behavior, reinforced by political backlash, educational censorship, and a culture determined to maintain patriarchal control. Her commentary reveals how deeply these systems undermine women—especially women of color—and why the U.S. lags behind dozens of nations that have elected women leaders.

  • Danielle Moodie argues that misogyny and racism remain foundational obstacles to electing a woman president.
  • Michelle Obama’s candid remarks reflect measurable public sentiment—four in ten Americans know someone who refuses to vote for a woman.
  • Women candidates continue to face caricatures, dehumanization, and gendered attacks, particularly women of color.
  • The U.S. lags behind numerous countries—across the Global North and Global South—that have successfully elected women leaders.
  • Moodie links the suppression of gender studies and anti-racism education to a coordinated effort to maintain patriarchy and limit women’s political power.

The conversation exposes a hard truth: the resistance to women’s leadership is not accidental but engineered through systems designed to hold power in the hands of a narrow elite. Moodie underscores that confronting misogyny and racism is not merely cultural work but structural work—and doing so is essential if America hopes to join the rest of the democratic world in embracing women as full political equals.


Premium Content (Complimentary)

The analysis delivered on Ana Cabrera Reports captures a profound contradiction at the heart of American democracy. Danielle Moodie, host of the Danielle Moodie Show, lays out a truth that remains uncomfortable for many: the United States, a nation that constantly proclaims itself a beacon of progress, has still not overcome the deeply embedded misogyny and racism that shape its political choices. Her assessment begins with Michelle Obama’s piercing observation—that America is “not ready” for a woman president—and Moodie expands that claim into a systemic critique of a country struggling to disentangle itself from patriarchal identity.

She points to the measurable evidence. A poll from American University shows that 4 in 10 Americans personally know someone who would refuse to vote for a woman president. That figure is not abstract—it reflects a lived reality that has shaped election cycles for years. It explains the dynamics of 2016 and 2024, when voters rejected seasoned, highly qualified women candidates in favor of Donald Trump, a figure who epitomized the kind of grievance politics and authoritarian masculinity that white patriarchy has historically rewarded. Moodie’s argument is blunt: America does not envision women as leaders because its foundational myths were written without women in mind.

Michelle Obama’s own experience during Barack Obama’s first campaign—how quickly she became a target, transformed from a Princeton- and Harvard-educated professional into a caricature: angry, unpatriotic, emasculating. That transformation was not rooted in anything she actually did, Obama notes, but in how America often perceives powerful Black women. The quote from Audre Lorde—“If I do not define myself, I would be crunched into other people’s fantasies for me and eaten alive”—becomes a guiding refrain. It reflects the survival strategy women of color must adopt to avoid being consumed by narratives written to diminish them.

The misogyny and racism are intertwined forces shaping electoral choices. Kamala Harris confronted two structural barriers in her campaign, compounded by time, media caricature, and political backlash. To ignore these forces is to misunderstand why progress remains stalled.

The video also confronts an international comparison too often ignored in U.S. political commentary. Nations across the world—Argentina, Iceland, India, New Zealand, Brazil, Mexico, Barbados, Bangladesh, and dozens more—have elected women heads of government or state. These countries span every hemisphere, every economic category, and every cultural tradition. Their electoral histories disprove any argument that the U.S. is somehow more modern or advanced than societies that have already normalized women’s leadership. The truth is that these countries moved beyond a patriarchal expectation that leadership must come in a male form, while the U.S. still clings to that expectation.

Moodie underscores another danger: the coordinated political attack on gender studies, anti-racism education, and public institutions that teach structural analysis. Erasing these fields does not protect anyone—it protects patriarchy. When lawmakers ban discussions of race, gender, misogyny, or inequality, they are not defending children; they are defending the systems that preserve their own power at the expense of a more inclusive democracy.

The critique widens to include America’s economic system. We connect resistance to electing a woman to a capitalist order rooted in hierarchy, scarcity, and competitive domination. A woman governing “as a woman”—prioritizing care, social investment, and communal well-being—poses a challenge to a system that demands extraction over empathy. Patriarchy is not merely cultural; it is economic. And challenging patriarchy requires challenging the economic structure that keeps it thriving.

Ultimately, Moodie’s analysis insists that America stands at a crossroads. Electing a woman—particularly a woman who governs with feminist and inclusive values—would mark a shift toward a more humane political order. The country has approached this moment before, backed away, and in some cases even regressed. But the path forward requires confronting the forces she identifies: misogyny, racism, educational suppression, patriarchal economics, and a media ecosystem that often reinforces these narratives instead of dismantling them. Only by addressing these systems can the United States join the rest of the democratic world in recognizing women as full and equal leaders.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Click to share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...

Support Our Politics Done Right Store

Filed Under: General Tagged With: American patriarchy, Ana Cabrera Reports, Danielle Moodie, feminist politics, Gender Bias, media analysis, Michelle Obama, misogyny, msnbc, Political Commentary, Politics Done Right, progressive analysis, racism in politics, sexism in politics, U.S. democracy, U.S. elections, woman president, women in leadership

About Egberto Willies

Egberto Willies is a political activist, author, political blogger, radio show host, business owner, software developer, web designer, and mechanical engineer in Kingwood, TX. He is an ardent Liberal that believes tolerance is essential. His favorite phrase is “political involvement should be a requirement for citizenship”. Willies is currently a contributing editor to DailyKos, OpEdNews, and several other Progressive sites. He was a frequent contributor to HuffPost Live. He won the 2nd CNN iReport Spirit Award and was the Pundit of the Week.

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • X
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr
  • LinkedIn

Politic Done Right

RevContent


Support Independent Media



RSS Feed

  • RSS - Posts
Mastodon
%d