John Kasich explains why DSA candidates are winning: affordability, energetic volunteers and bold ideas. Eddie Glaude shows why tired socialist scare tactics increasingly fail.
Summary
Eddie Glaude Jr. and former Republican Ohio Gov. John Kasich approach politics from very different ideological traditions, yet both land on an important truth about the Democratic Socialists of America: voters increasingly care less about ideological labels than whether politicians understand their economic pain and offer something concrete. Glaude focuses on the crushing cost of everyday life, while Kasich points to affordability, bold ideas, enthusiasm, and face-to-face organizing as reasons DSA-backed candidates have gained traction. The convergenceis unmistakable.
- Glaude rejects the politics of labels. Calling candidates “socialists” or “communists” does little for people struggling with electric bills, groceries, housing, policing, and other everyday pressures.
- Kasich identifies affordability as the central connection. He explicitly says DSA candidates connect with voters on affordability.
-
Grassroots organizing matters. Kasich praises DSA supporters for meeting voters face-to-face and making intense personal contact rather than relying exclusively on advertising and consultants.
-
Boldness beats political mush. Kasich argues that establishment candidates must offer bold ideas instead of empty promises that things will somehow improve.
-
Recent elections reinforce the argument. Progressive and democratic socialist candidates have notched high-profile 2026 victories, including Angie Nixon’s surprise win in the Florida Democratic U.S. Senate primary. AP reports that her campaign emphasized economic justice, universal healthcare, grassroots organizing, and social media outreach.
The lesson is bigger than DSA. Working people want politicians who will fight for their lives materially. When candidates organize from the bottom up and offer concrete answers to unaffordable healthcare, housing, food, and utilities, ideological scare words lose much of their power.
PLEASE BECOME A PAID SUBSCRIBER TODAY
Countering billionaires—and soon trillionaires—is hard, probing work. They flood the zone with propaganda, policy distortions, and economic fallacies rooted in the Powell Memo and financed by concentrated wealth. We work every day to answer that machinery with truth, context, and critical thinking. But independent media cannot survive on conviction alone. It needs support from people who understand the stakes. Please become a paid subscriber today. Your support keeps this work alive, expands its reach, and helps build a media ecosystem that serves people, not plutocrats. This is not charity. It is an investment in truth, democracy, and the public good.
Premium Content (Complimentary)
Glaude and Kasich Accidentally Explain Why DSA Is Winning
Something important happens when a progressive intellectual and a former Republican governor analyze the same political phenomenon and arrive at essentially the same conclusion. Eddie Glaude Jr. and John Kasich do not share an ideology, but both understand why Democratic Socialists of America-backed candidates are generating enthusiasm and occasionally producing stunning electoral victories.
It starts with material reality.
Glaude cuts through the ideological theater by pointing to what people actually experience every day: electric bills, gas bills, groceries, housing costs, policing, and the many pressures that determine whether a family can breathe financially. Calling someone a socialist or communist does not pay a utility bill. It does not lower the rent. It does not make healthcare affordable. Glaude correctly identifies the weakness of a political strategy built primarily around frightening voters with labels.
Kasich, coming from the Republican side, makes essentially the same diagnosis. He says DSA candidates connect with voters on affordability. More importantly, he recognizes their organizational advantage. They meet people face-to-face. Their volunteers possess energy. They knock on doors, make contact, organize supporters, and give voters something to believe they can actually change.
That observation should terrify the consultant class.
For decades, too much Democratic politics has depended on expensive advertising, poll-tested language, cautious positioning, and candidates trained to say as little as possible while offending as few donors as possible. Kasich, of all people, identifies the problem. He says candidates need bold ideas. Merely promising that things will improve does not work. A candidate must present a vision capable of exciting people and then organize from the grassroots up.
Current evidence supports the affordability argument.
In April 2026, the Pew Research Center found that 73% of Americans called healthcare affordability a very big national problem, while 66% said the same about inflation. Even more revealing, 74% identified the role of money in politics as a very big problem. These numbers describe an electorate deeply dissatisfied with an economic and political system that too often appears designed around wealthy interests rather than ordinary people.
Then came the elections.
In Florida, democratic socialist Angie Nixon stunned the political establishment by defeating the better-funded, more conventional Alex Vindman in the Democratic U.S. Senate primary. AP reports that Nixon centered economic justice and universal healthcare while relying heavily on grassroots organizing. Reuters subsequently placed Nixon’s victory alongside other progressive successes as evidence of a growing internal debate over the Democratic Party’s direction.
That does not mean every DSA candidate will win, nor does it mean every voter suddenly identifies as a democratic socialist. The deeper point matters more: voters increasingly reward politicians who identify their pain, name its causes, and propose tangible solutions.
Kasich still distances himself from portions of the DSA platform, even describing some ideas as potentially “crazy.” That disagreement should not obscure his much more consequential admission: these candidates are saying something while too many conventional politicians specialize in saying nothing.
Progressives should embrace that lesson rather than retreat from it.
Medicare for All, affordable housing, stronger unions, higher wages, public investment, economic democracy, and restraints on concentrated corporate power resonate because they address problems people actually experience. Corporate interests will call those ideas radical. Political consultants will advise moderation. Right-wing media will scream “socialism.”
But a family staring at another outrageous healthcare bill cares considerably more about whether somebody intends to fix it.
Glaude understands that. Kasich understands it.
The Democratic establishment had better understand it soon.
