Sen. Schmitt tried to link Jack Smith to Fani Willis through an Atlanta basketball claim. Klobuchar checked the facts, exposed the flawed premise and demanded an apology.
PLEASE BECOME A PAID SUBSCRIBER TODAY
We make our newsletters and videos free because everyone deserves the truth, regardless of their ability to pay. To counter the lies of the billionaire and corporate media, we must reach as many Americans as possible. We don’t need unlimited funds, but we rely entirely on small-dollar grassroots support to keep going. Please become a paid subscriber today so we can keep flooding the zone with the truth. We can’t do this without you.
Summary
Senator Amy Klobuchar exposed the flimsy foundation beneath Senator Eric Schmitt’s attempt to implicate former special counsel Jack Smith in an Atlanta conspiracy involving Fani Willis. Schmitt escalated a basketball reference into a perjury accusation before adequately examining the evidence. Klobuchar insisted that Smith see the material, explain himself, and receive the basic fairness that Schmitt’s performance denied him.
- Schmitt built his accusation around the wrong basketball team. He questioned Smith about an Atlanta Hawks game while Smith recalled attending an Iowa Hawkeyes game in Maryland.
- Smith rejected the Atlanta premise. He denied attending the Hawks game and testified that he had not met Willis or Nathan Wade during his tenure as special counsel.
-
Klobuchar demanded access to the purported evidence. She challenged the practice of briefly displaying a chart, removing it, and then accusing the witness.
-
The game record supported Smith’s explanation. Iowa defeated Maryland 93–85 in College Park on February 3, 2024, with Caitlin Clark scoring 38 points.
-
Klobuchar demanded an apology. The supplied exchange shows her confronting Schmitt over the false premise, the insinuation of misconduct, and his personal insult.
The episode illustrates how partisan intimidation operates: announce a scandal, attack the target, and resist accountability when the facts puncture the accusation. Klobuchar demonstrated the necessary response—interrupt the smear and establish the facts.
Premium Content (Complimentary)
Klobuchar Exposes Schmitt’s False Jack Smith Claim—and the Politics Behind It
Senator Eric Schmitt wanted a devastating moment against Jack Smith. Instead, Senator Amy Klobuchar exposed a devastating failure in Schmitt’s own accusation. The Missouri Republican tried to place the former special counsel in Atlanta, connect that supposed visit to Fani Willis, and turn Smith’s denial into an accusation of perjury. His dramatic presentation collapsed around a basic distinction: the Atlanta Hawks and the Iowa Hawkeyes are different basketball teams.
The exchange occurred during the Senate Judiciary Committee’s September 29, 2026, hearing featuring Smith. Even the committee’s official title framed the proceeding around alleged abuse of authority and the targeting of Republicans. That framing made the responsibility to test evidence especially urgent. A congressional hearing carries public authority; senators cannot responsibly treat its accusations as disposable campaign material.
Schmitt pressed Smith about attending a February 3, 2024, basketball game in Atlanta. He invoked Willis’s relationship with prosecutor Nathan Wade and suggested that text messages contradicted Smith’s testimony. He then escalated to perjury before giving Smith a meaningful opportunity to examine the material. The sequence reveals the central problem: Schmitt delivered the accusation before establishing its factual foundation.
Klobuchar intervened at precisely that point. She demanded that the witness receive the document and have an opportunity to answer. Her intervention established a standard that should govern every hearing: evidence must withstand examination. A senator cannot flash a poster board, remove it from view, and demand that everyone accept his interpretation as proof.
Once Smith could address the reference, the supposed mystery became considerably less mysterious. He recalled attending a women’s basketball game featuring Caitlin Clark and Iowa against Maryland. He also said U.S. marshals accompanied him, identifying another potential avenue for verification. Klobuchar recognized the likely confusion between the Hawks and Hawkeyes and challenged Schmitt’s preparation.
The University of Maryland’s contemporaneous account confirms the game’s date, location, and outcome. Iowa defeated Maryland 93–85 at the XFINITY Center in College Park on February 3, 2024. Clark scored 38 points. Those independently verifiable details match the game Smith described and undercut the basketball premise behind Schmitt’s Atlanta insinuation.
The political significance extends beyond an embarrassing sports mistake. An official who genuinely seeks the truth follows contradictory evidence wherever it leads. When an accusation collapses, that official corrects the record. In the supplied exchange, Schmitt instead complained about Klobuchar’s intervention and defended his attack. His response made the episode more revealing than the original error.
This is how congressional power can serve a politics of intimidation. A prosecutor who investigated a powerful politician becomes the target of insinuation and personal degradation. The spectacle encourages the audience to evaluate partisan loyalty instead of evidence. It also sends a chilling message to other public servants: pursuing accountability can bring public humiliation from those protecting the powerful.
Klobuchar’s response offers Democrats a practical lesson. They should challenge false premises immediately, demand the underlying evidence, and make corrections as visible as the original accusations. Waiting patiently for a smear to exhaust itself lets misinformation define the discussion. A firm interruption can restore the public’s attention to what the evidence actually establishes.
Schmitt owed Smith an apology and the public a correction. Congressional oversight belongs to the people, and its legitimacy depends on honest scrutiny. A progressive defense of democracy requires confronting officials who use that authority to shield political power from accountability. Klobuchar did exactly what the moment required: she forced a theatrical accusation to confront the facts.
