Donald Trump has his crosshairs on Panama not because of some security or financial concern for America but because his company is under investigation for tax evasion and more in Panama.
Panama Canal reality.
Watch Politics Done Right T.V. here.
Podcasts (Video — Audio)
Summary
The video critiques the media’s inadequate coverage of Donald Trump’s threats to seize the Panama Canal, arguing that they fail to address the underlying motives and global implications of his rhetoric. It highlights Trump’s history of corruption, specifically in Panama, and his use of nationalist rhetoric to distract from personal vendettas. The failure of journalists to provide critical context allows Trump’s authoritarian tendencies and self-serving actions to go unchecked.
Key Points:
- Media Framing Failure: The press treats Trump’s threats as a joke or mere rhetoric, failing to address the legal and diplomatic stakes.
- Trump’s Corruption in Panama: Trump businesses have unresolved allegations of tax evasion and money laundering linked to Trump Tower Panama, which may motivate his threats against the country.
- Historical Context Ignored: Unlike past discussions about the Panama Canal, Trump’s rhetoric involves overt threats to violate treaties and seize territory.
- Manipulation of Public Opinion: Trump uses nationalist and expansionist rhetoric to rally his base, disguising his vendettas as patriotic acts.
- Dangerous Precedent: Media inaction risks normalizing Trump’s authoritarian behavior, threatening U.S. credibility and the rule of law.
Progressive Perspective Summary
The video exposes the troubling reality that Donald Trump’s threats against Panama are rooted not in national interest but in personal corruption and greed. By failing to connect the dots, mainstream media is enabling his authoritarian agenda and betraying their duty to hold power accountable. Progressive voices must demand better reporting and a renewed commitment to transparency and truth, lest Trump’s dangerous actions further erode democratic norms and global stability.
Premium Content
The mainstream media’s coverage of Donald Trump’s threats to seize the Panama Canal reflects a glaring failure in journalistic responsibility. While alarming, the press is not adequately contextualizing Trump’s rhetoric. By treating these threats as a geopolitical curiosity or another instance of Trump’s “larger-than-life” persona, media outlets overlook the dangerous implications of such a stance. More importantly, they are missing the underlying motives that drive Trump’s fixation with the canal—motives steeped in personal corruption and self-interest. This dereliction of duty by the press is not just a disservice to the public but a tacit endorsement of authoritarianism.
Trump’s threats to use military or economic power to take control of the Panama Canal are not merely the musings of an eccentric former president. They are part of a larger pattern of his authoritarian tendencies, which include disregarding international treaties, threatening foreign sovereignty, and exploiting national institutions for personal gain. The 1977 Torrijos-Carter Treaties guaranteed Panama’s sovereignty over the canal, but Trump’s rhetoric flagrantly ignores these agreements. By framing his intentions as a patriotic endeavor to “expand America” or “show strength,” Trump panders to his base while threatening to undermine decades of diplomacy.
The media’s failure lies in their inability to frame Trump’s threats within this broader context. As evidenced by the recent discussions, coverage often skirts the core issues. For instance, much attention has been paid to whether Trump is “serious” about his threats or whether they are merely another outlandish statement meant to garner attention. This superficial focus detracts from the very real implications of his rhetoric. Is the press asking whether Trump’s actions are lawful? Are they probing into the personal motivations behind his threats? Are they examining how such actions would impact Panama, the region, and U.S. foreign relations? The answer is essentially no.
This lack of scrutiny is especially troubling when one considers the real motivation behind Trump’s obsession with the Panama Canal. Trump’s business dealings in Panama have long been fraught with allegations of corruption. Trump Tower Panama, one of his international properties, has been at the center of accusations involving tax evasion, money laundering, and connections to drug cartels. These allegations date back to at least 2019 and remain unresolved in Panamanian courts. By threatening Panama with military or economic action, Trump appears to be leveraging the power and reputation of the United States to pressure the Panamanian government into dropping these cases. This is not about national security or economic necessity but personal vendettas and the preservation of Trump’s business empire.
Yet, the media has largely failed to clarify this connection to the American public. Instead, they treat Trump’s threats as either a geopolitical anomaly or a piece of political theater. By doing so, they inadvertently normalize his behavior and allow his dangerous rhetoric to go unchecked. Worse still, they allow Trump to frame himself as a defender of American interests when, in reality, his actions are a brazen attempt to shield himself from accountability.
The implications of Trump’s threats extend far beyond Panama. If he were to succeed in using U.S. power to coerce a foreign government for personal gain, it would set a chilling precedent. It would signal to the world that the United States is willing to disregard international law and treaties to satisfy the whims of a single individual. It would also embolden Trump and others like him to continue exploiting public institutions for private benefit.
The press is responsible for exposing these dangers, but they cannot do so if they continue to treat Trump’s rhetoric as a spectacle rather than a serious threat. This means going beyond surface-level reporting and delving into the motivations and consequences of his actions. It means connecting the dots between his threats against Panama and his business interests there. It means holding him accountable for his words and the corruption that underpins them.
Journalists must also challenge the narrative that Trump’s actions are somehow part of a larger strategy to “expand” America or assert its dominance. This framing only legitimizes his rhetoric and obscures the true nature of his motives. Instead, the press should focus on the harm that Trump’s actions could cause—not just Panama but America’s reputation and the rule of law.
Trump has repeatedly shown a willingness to sacrifice the public good for personal gain. His mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in hundreds of thousands of preventable deaths, is a stark reminder of this. His threats against Panama should be seen in the same light. They are not the actions of a leader seeking to protect American interests; they are the machinations of a man willing to harm others to protect himself.
In the face of such threats, the role of the media is clear: to inform the public, to expose the truth, and to hold those in power accountable. By failing to do so, the press becomes complicit in Trump’s attempts to manipulate public opinion and undermine democratic norms. It is time for journalists to wake up and take their responsibilities seriously. The stakes are too high to allow Trump to hoodwink them—or the American public—any longer.
