Ted Cruz, the man who went to Washington to make waves, is feeling an undertow back home.
The militantly self-assured Mr. Cruz went to Washington to splash salt water in others’ faces. Now he squints into some nasty spray.
Could he be the first Texas Republican to lose a statewide office since 1994?
The odds against it remain great, but the polls, the crowds and – most amazingly — the campaign dollars say, “Wait a minute.”
A recent Texas Lyceum poll shows El Paso Congressman Beto O’Rourke trailing Cruz by 2 points.
Meanwhile, O’Rourke raised $6.7 million in the first quarter, more than twice Cruz’s haul.
How so? To expedite matters, try one word: Trump.
The more truthful explanation is longer. It is two words: Beto O’Rourke.
The man is waging the most dogged campaign imaginable while impressing giant crowd after giant crowd with his presence and low-key eloquence.
O’Rourke has come a long way from an unknown to a major threat to Cruz. Relative to voter attitudes, he has a long way to go still.
Considering how close the race has become – another poll shows O’Rourke trailing by 6 points – the fact that most Texans already have an impression of Cruz and that 43 percent (according to a Quinnipiac poll in July) were still forming an opinion about O’Rourke shows that with his resources, O’Rourke can close that gap handily and more people get to know him.
Here are four good reasons why Cruz should worry — some obvious, some not so obvious:
(1) A lying, racist, sexist president: He who makes sport of misrepresenting the truth, who inflames people of color, and who lives a life of misogyny is harming his party nationwide. To those skeptical of a “blue wave” in November: It’s already happening.
In addition to high-profile pick-ups like Doug Jones’ U.S. Senate victory in Alabama and Conor Lamb’s taking the Pennsylvania’s 18th District seat in Congress, Democrats have flipped 43 GOP-held seats in state and local races across the country.
(2) Angry voters: The poli-sci rule of thumb is that in low-turnout elections, which off-year elections tend to be, the accent is on the angry vote.
We can attribute the GOP takeover of the House in 2010 and the Senate in 2014 to that dynamic, with the angry white voters of the tea party the life force of the takeover of Congress.
We are seeing the same thing right now among angry progressive voters, with the revulsion toward Donald Trump and the sycophantic behavior of his Republican enablers the motivators.
According to Pew, turnout by Democrats in primaries this year is 84 percent higher than this point in 2014.
(3) The Lupe factor: The outlook doesn’t look good for Texas Democratic gubernatorial nominee Lupe Valdez in her race against incumbent Greg Abbott. However, her nomination provides a silver lining for O’Rourke and other Democrats running.
To whatever degree it manifests itself, Valdez’ presence on the ballot is going to boost turnout by Latinos in Texas, absolutely crucial to Democrats’ chances.
(4) The voter hassle boomerang: Could it be that Republicans’ propensity to make it inconvenient to vote will blow up in their faces in November? Yes, it could.
When it comes to voting rights, Texas is one of the nation’s greatest scofflaws. Just ask federal judges.
The latest run-up with the law: In April, U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia ruled that Texas had violated the National Voter Registration Act for failing to register residents to vote when they updated their drivers’ license information online.
Generally it serves Republican interests to suppress turnout. However, in 2018, with swarms of Democrats ready to wade through molten lava to register their anger at the polls, it won’t serve the party of Trump at all.
If off-year election history is our guide, Republicans soon could be asking, “Why didn’t our people show up?”
Viewers are encouraged to subscribe and join the conversation for more insightful commentary and to support progressive messages. Together, we can populate the internet with progressive messages that represent the true aspirations of most Americans.
Janice M Kelly says
Great article. I’m a former New Yorker retired to SC. This article hit a nerve with me. The same conditions exist down here. A red state for too many years. We need to support candidates who can exude good moral fiber who will not stand for the behaviors of a president who has done tremendous harm to the values we hold most dear. The Republican Congress has proven they will ignore any behaviors, absolutely horrendous. I would be willing to work on any volunteer system from Texas that needs callers to remind people to vote for specific progressive candidates if they set up a system for me to use. AND we all need to be brave enough to state why we feel certain candidates are worthy for the positions they are seeking. Too many are quiet.
That’s why we got a Trump.