EgbertoWillies.com

Political involvement should be a requirement for citizenship

  • Home
    • Homepage
    • Login
    • About Us
    • Bio
    • Research
      • BallotPedia
      • Bureau of Labor Statistics
      • CallMyCongress
      • LegiScan
      • OpenSecrets.org
      • Texas Legislature Online
      • US Dept; Of Health & Human Services
      • US Dept. of Labor
      • VoteSmart
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
  • Shows
    • Live TV
    • Move to Amend Reports
    • Politics Done Right
  • Books
  • Articles
    • AlterNet
    • CNN iReports
    • CommonDreams
    • DailyKos
    • Medium
    • OpEdNews
    • Substack
  • Activism
    • Battleground Texas
    • Coffee Party
    • Move To Amend
    • OccupyMovement
  • Social
    • BlueSky
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • Pinterest
    • Tumblr
    • Twitter
    • YouTube
  • Sections
    • Environment
    • Food And Cooking
    • Health
    • Local News
    • Odd News
    • People Making A Difference
    • Political
    • Reviews
      • Book Reviews
      • Books I Recommend
      • Product Reviews
    • Sports
    • Substack Notes
  • Donate
  • Store

Trump Allies Use Faith to Justify War as Divine Mission Through Hegseth and Graham

April 22, 2026 By Egberto Willies Leave a Comment

Trump Allies Use Faith to Justify War as Divine Mission Through Hegseth and Graham

Trump allies use religious rhetoric to justify war, framing violence as God’s will. This analysis exposes the danger of blending faith, power, and militarism.

Filed Under: General Tagged With: anti war, democracy, evangelical politics, faith and power, Franklin Graham, geopolitics, Iran war, MILITARISM, Pete Hegseth, political rhetoric, progressive analysis, religion and politics, Trump, US foreign policy, War Propaganda

Hegseth Complains Iran Hides Targets as War Chaos, Death, and Economic Pain Grow

April 4, 2026 By Egberto Willies

Hegseth Complains Iran Hides Targets as War Chaos, Death, and Economic Pain Grow

U.S. officials complain Iran hides targets as war escalates, killing thousands and hurting Americans through rising costs and economic instability.

Filed Under: General Tagged With: anti war, defense spending, Economic Inequality, geopolitics, Hegseth, imperialism critique, inflation, Iran war, Middle East, military industrial complex, Oil Prices, Progressive Politics, US foreign policy, war economy

Rubio Tells Iran Invest in People—But U.S. Military Spending Exposes Hypocrisy

April 4, 2026 By Egberto Willies

Marco Rubio Gives Iran Advice U.S. Needs For Ourselves

Rubio says Iran should invest in its people, but U.S. military spending vs healthcare reveals deep hypocrisy and misplaced moral authority.

Filed Under: General Tagged With: American Exceptionalism, Foreign policy, geopolitics, healthcare crisis, Iran, Marco Rubio, military industrial complex, nuclear weapons, political hypocrisy, progressive analysis, U.S. military spending, war economy

Trump Insider Quits, Reveals Iran War Was Driven by Israel Lobby Pressure

March 17, 2026 By Egberto Willies

Trump Insider Quits, Reveals Iran War Was Driven by Israel Lobby Pressure

A stunning resignation exposes how misinformation and lobbying drove Trump’s Iran war. The real story challenges everything Americans were told.

Filed Under: General Tagged With: Anti War Movement, Corporate Media Failure, geopolitics, independent journalism, Iran Conflict, Israel Lobby, Joseph Kent, military industrial complex, Trump Iran war, US foreign policy, War Propaganda

Iran Bombing Backfire? Expert Says Trump Triggered a Global Escalation Trap

March 13, 2026 By Egberto Willies

Iran Bombing Backfire? Expert Says Trump Triggered a Global Escalation Trap

Experts warn that Trump’s Iran air campaign may have dispersed uranium and triggered a dangerous escalation trap that could widen the conflict and destabilize global security.

Filed Under: General Tagged With: Escalation Trap, geopolitics, Independent media, Iran Nuclear Program, Iran war, Middle East conflict, military strategy, Nuclear Proliferation, progressive analysis, Trump, U.S. Foreign Policy, War Escalation

Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney’s speech at World Economic Forum in Davos

January 25, 2026 By Egberto Willies

Davos Shock: Mark Carney Urges Nations to Break Free From U.S. Coercion

At Davos, Mark Carney warns the rules-based order has ruptured, urges middle powers to stop pretending, build shared resilience, and wield values-based realism to confront great-power coercion.

Filed Under: General Tagged With: Canada Foreign Policy, Davos, democracy, Economic Coercion, geopolitics, Global Governance, Global Order, Global South, Great Power Rivalry, Human Rights, International Relations, Mark Carney, Middle Powers, Multilateralism, Progressive Foreign Policy, Rules Based Order, Strategic Autonomy, Sustainable Development, Trade Policy, Values Based Realism, World Economic Forum

The Hidden Link Between EV, Tariffs, Wind Energy, Greenland, Venezuela, and Oil Imperialism

December 27, 2025 By Egberto Willies

The debate around electric vehicles, windmills, Greenland, Venezuela, oil, and tariffs often appears fragmented, as if each issue exists in its own policy silo. That illusion serves power well. When examined together, these issues reveal a coherent and troubling strategy rooted in protecting entrenched corporate interests—particularly fossil fuels—through coercion, misinformation, and state intervention. The common thread between EVs, … Tariffs on Chinese-made electric vehicles offer the first clue. Classical capitalism argues for efficiency: if another country produces a superior product at lower cost, markets should reward that efficiency. Instead, punitive tariffs block affordable EVs while U.S. automakers scale back production. This is not market correction; it is market distortion. The private sector failed to invest aggressively in EVs when it had the chance, and now the state shields that failure rather than confronting it. That choice delays climate progress and leaves working families paying more for fewer options. The same logic explains the hostility toward wind energy. Offshore wind projects—many led by Danish firms like Ørsted—represent large-scale threats to oil’s dominance. Claims that turbines threaten national security collapse under basic physics and radar science. Modern militaries already distinguish complex signal environments. What truly alarms fossil interests is that wind power reduces dependence on oil, shrinking profits and geopolitical leverage. That fear also clarifies renewed fixation on Greenland. Greenland holds vast reserves of rare earth minerals essential for renewable energy and advanced electronics. Though self-governing under Denmark, Greenland faces external pressure framed as “strategic interest.” This echoes earlier imperial patterns: identify resources, question sovereignty, insert influence. The outrage from Danish and Greenlandic leaders reflects a fundamental truth—resource desire, not defense, drives this attention. Venezuela fits squarely into the same pattern. The country sits atop some of the world’s largest oil reserves and significant mineral wealth. For decades, U.S. policy has punished Venezuela through sanctions, asset seizures, and maritime enforcement, all while claiming humanitarian concern. Yet countries like Norway demonstrate that public stewardship of resources can fund social welfare without economic collapse. Venezuela’s crime, in Washington’s eyes, was asserting sovereignty over its wealth rather than surrendering it to multinational corporations. Oil companies themselves expose the contradiction. Firms like BP once rebranded as forward-looking energy leaders, promising transition. Those campaigns vanished once profits surged. Instead of reinvesting excess earnings into renewables, corporations doubled down on extraction, lobbying governments to block competitors like wind and EVs. This is not capitalism evolving—it is capitalism captured. At the center of these choices stands political leadership that embraces spectacle over strategy. Under Donald Trump, renewable projects halted on whim, tariffs replaced planning, and foreign policy blurred into open resource intimidation. Such instability undermines even the business community, which relies on regulatory certainty to invest and innovate. When policy shifts with personal bias, economies stagnate. The common thread, then, is imperial protectionism: using state power to preserve corporate dominance while denying both citizens and other nations the benefits of technological and economic progress. Tariffs replace industrial policy. Sabotage replaces transition. Coercion replaces diplomacy. Democracy becomes collateral damage. Progressive policy offers a different path—one rooted in public investment, energy democracy, international cooperation, and respect for sovereignty. Markets can function, but only when they serve people rather than empires. The future economy—clean, distributed, and equitable—will not emerge from fear-driven policy. It will emerge when voters demand leadership willing to break from extraction and embrace transition.

The fight over EVs and renewables exposes how resource extraction still drives U.S. economic and foreign policy.

Filed Under: General Tagged With: clean energy, Climate Justice, corporate power, energy policy, EV tariffs, fossil fuels, geopolitics, Greenland, imperialism, oil politics, progressive economics, renewable energy, venezuela, Wind Power

10% Discount Coupon Code: POLITICSDONERIGHT

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • X
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr
  • LinkedIn

Politic Done Right


Support Independent Media



Mastodon

RSS Feed

  • RSS - Posts